502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28969608)
21. Solitary and small (≤3 mm) apical positive surgical margins are related to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
May M; Brookman-May S; Weißbach L; Herbst H; Gilfrich C; Papadopoulos T; Roigas J; Hofstädter F; Wieland WF; Burger M
Int J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21342298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Five-year oncological outcomes of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) for prostate cancer: results from a medium-volume UK centre.
McNeill SA; Good DW; Stewart GD; Stolzenburg JU
BJU Int; 2014 Mar; 113(3):449-57. PubMed ID: 23980640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
Matti B; Reeves F; Prouse M; Zargar-Shoshtari K
Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].
Roux V; Eyraud R; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Fofana M; Blanchet P
Prog Urol; 2017; 27(8-9):467-473. PubMed ID: 28576421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Level of invasion into fibromuscular band is an independent factor for positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence in men with organ confined prostate cancer.
Kim A; Kim M; Jeong SU; Song C; Cho YM; Ro JY; Ahn H
BMC Urol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 29394928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Extent of positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy: impact on biochemical recurrence with long-term follow-up.
Koskas Y; Lannes F; Branger N; Giusiano S; Guibert N; Pignot G; Walz J; Rossi D; Bastide C
BMC Urol; 2019 May; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 31092240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wrong to be Right: Margin Laterality is an Independent Predictor of Biochemical Failure After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kang JJ; Reiter RE; Kummer N; DeKernion J; Steinberg ML; King CR
Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26237192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Close surgical margins after radical prostatectomy mimic biochemical recurrence rates of positive margins.
Whalen MJ; Shapiro EY; Rothberg MB; Turk AT; Woldu SL; Roy Choudhury A; Patel T; Badani KK
Urol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):494.e9-494.e14. PubMed ID: 26259665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictors of biochemical recurrence in pT3b prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy.
Pagano MJ; Whalen MJ; Paulucci DJ; Reddy BN; Matulay JT; Rothberg M; Scarberry K; Patel T; Shapiro EY; RoyChoudhury A; McKiernan J; Benson MC; Badani KK
Prostate; 2016 Feb; 76(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 26481325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
