BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28969608)

  • 61. Ki-67 expression predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the setting of positive surgical margins.
    Shahait M; Nassif S; Tamim H; Mukherji D; Hijazi M; El Sabban M; Khauli R; Bulbul M; Abou Kheir W; El Hajj A
    BMC Urol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 29506507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer.
    Ceylan C; Tonyali S; Keles I
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 32(10):514-517. PubMed ID: 27742035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Predictors of early, intermediate and late biochemical recurrence after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in a single-centre cohort with a mean follow-up of 8 years.
    García-Barreras S; Nunes I; Srougi V; Secin F; Baghdadi M; Sánchez-Salas R; Barret E; Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018 Oct; 42(8):516-523. PubMed ID: 29606285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.
    Oh JJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 21658977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ginzburg S; Nevers T; Staff I; Tortora J; Champagne A; Kesler SS; Laudone VP; Wagner JR
    JSLS; 2012; 16(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23318071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Diaz M; Peabody JO; Kapoor V; Sammon J; Rogers CG; Stricker H; Lane Z; Gupta N; Bhandari M; Menon M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 24996687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins.
    Meyer CP; Hansen J; Boehm K; Tilki D; Abdollah F; Trinh QD; Fisch M; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H; Chun FK; Ahyai SA
    World J Urol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 27260503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Predictive Factors for Early Biochemical Recurrence Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Mitsunari K; Fukushima H; Kurata H; Harada J; Nakamura Y; Matsuo T; Ohba K; Mochizuki Y; Imamura R
    Anticancer Res; 2024 Jul; 44(7):3149-3154. PubMed ID: 38925837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Impact of Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy on Disease Progression and Adjuvant Treatment in Pathologically Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Tomasković I; Milicić V; Tomić M; Ruzić B; Ulamec M
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):697-700. PubMed ID: 26898068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Implications of adjuvant treatment].
    Fagundo EV; Amo FH; López EL; Sánchez JP; Jiménez Gdel P; Chamizo JA; Cordero JM; Fernández ME; Fernández CH
    Arch Esp Urol; 2012; 65(1):158-65. PubMed ID: 22318186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Impact of positive surgical margin location and perineural invasion on biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Lian Z; Zhang H; He Z; Ma S; Wang X; Liu R
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 32791998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
    Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Race and prostate weight as independent predictors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Jayachandran J; Robertson CN; Moul JW
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 18427570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.