These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

932 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28969918)

  • 1. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fit Accuracy of Pressed and Milled Lithium Disilicate Inlays Fabricated From Conventional Impressions or a Laboratory-Based Digital Workflow.
    Homsy F; Bottin M; Özcan M; Majzoub Z
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 30779496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments.
    Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography.
    Uzgur R; Ercan E; Uzgur Z; Çolak H; Yalçın M; Özcan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):456-460. PubMed ID: 27517616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique.
    Guachetá L; Stevens CD; Tamayo Cardona JA; Murgueitio R
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):715-720. PubMed ID: 33174306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the Crystallization Firing Process on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Silicate-based Glass-ceramic Inlays Fabricated With a CAD/CAM Chairside System.
    Kobayashi M; Niizuma Y; Sugai R; Manabe A
    Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):657-665. PubMed ID: 37882476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate.
    Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Production tolerance of conventional and digital workflow in the manufacturing of glass ceramic crowns.
    Mahmood DJH; Braian M; Larsson C; Wennerberg A
    Dent Mater; 2019 Mar; 35(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 30686710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different Methods for Inlay Production: Effect on Internal and Marginal Adaptation, Adjustment Time, and Contact Point.
    Rippe MP; Monaco C; Volpe L; Bottino MA; Scotti R; Valandro LF
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 28402732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.