These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
932 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28969918)
21. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing. Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT. Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of inlay and onlay restorations based on 3D printing or milling technique - a pilot study. Ahlholm P; Sipilä K; Vallittu P; Kotiranta U; Lappalainen R Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):56-64. PubMed ID: 31046209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. Guess PC; Vagkopoulou T; Zhang Y; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 24161516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology. Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression. Su TS; Sun J J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single crowns manufactured with an analog workflow and three CAD-CAM systems: A prospective clinical study. Sanchez-Lara A; Hosney S; Lampraki E; Conejo J; Blatz MB; Barmak AB; Ercoli C; Chochlidakis K J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 36883776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Load-bearing capacity, internal accuracy and time-efficiency of heat-pressed, milled and 3D-printed lithium disilicate ultra-thin occlusal veneers. Paqué PN; Gantner C; Mätzener KJ; Özcan M; Ioannidis A Dent Mater; 2024 Oct; 40(10):1602-1610. PubMed ID: 39079765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology. Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of Inlays Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques: A Stereomicroscopic Study. Sharma A; Abraham D; Gupita A; Singh A; Sharma N Contemp Clin Dent; 2020; 11(3):237-244. PubMed ID: 33776349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique. Rizonaki M; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P; Depla L; Boone M; De Coster PJ J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]