These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28970057)

  • 1. Understanding the Legal Essentials of a Bowel Injury Lawsuit in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.
    Walden PA; Zeybek B; Phelps JY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 28970057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Litigations Involving Ureteral Injury Related to Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Lessons Learned from a Legal Literature Review.
    Kim E; Wu H; Simpson K; Patzkowsky K; Wang K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):608-617. PubMed ID: 30453075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regarding "Understanding the Legal Essentials of a Bowel Injury Lawsuit in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery".
    Vilos GA; Vilos AG; Rafea BA; Ternamian A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):1107-1108. PubMed ID: 29654843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic bowel injuries: forty litigated gynaecological cases in Canada.
    Vilos GA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Mar; 24(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 12196872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal liability in iatrogenic orbital injury.
    Svider PF; Kovalerchik O; Mauro AC; Baredes S; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Sep; 123(9):2099-103. PubMed ID: 23404575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical malpractice claims in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a Dutch overview of 20 years.
    Sandberg EM; Bordewijk EM; Klemann D; Driessen SRC; Twijnstra ARH; Jansen FW
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5418-5426. PubMed ID: 28634629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicolegal Review: Essure Lawsuits and Legal Strategies Adverse to Gynecologists.
    Klimczak AM; Snyder RR; Borahay MA; Phelps JY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):727-730. PubMed ID: 28254503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis.
    Morris LG; Ziff DJ; DeLacure MD
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jan; 134(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 18209145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medicolegal review of liability risks for gynecologists stemming from lack of training in robot-assisted surgery.
    Lee YL; Kilic GS; Phelps JY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(4):512-5. PubMed ID: 21777841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetric and gynecologic malpractice in Turkey: incidence, impact, causes and prevention.
    Büken E; Ornek Büken N; Büken B
    J Clin Forensic Med; 2004 Oct; 11(5):233-47. PubMed ID: 15489176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Litigation Arising From Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures: A Review of the Literature.
    Hibler BP; Eliades PJ; Kagha KC; Avram MM
    Dermatol Surg; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1606-1613. PubMed ID: 34417380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Will my malpractice case be settled? The physician-defendant's voice in the decision.
    Archambault WH
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 2007 May; 24(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 17633353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in malpractice claims for obstetric and gynecologic procedures, 2005 through 2014.
    Glaser LM; Alvi FA; Milad MP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 28549980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visceral injury at gynaecological surgery: demonstration of reasonable care affords acceptable defence.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Edozien L
    BJOG; 2017 Sep; 124(10):1557. PubMed ID: 28834256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.
    Daniels AH; Ruttiman R; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Brea BA; Palumbo MA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):470-475. PubMed ID: 28731391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Malodorous consequences: what comprises negligence in anosmia litigation?
    Svider PF; Mauro AC; Eloy JA; Setzen M; Carron MA; Folbe AJ
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Mar; 4(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 24395721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Urogynecologycal surgery : Informed consent and other medicolegal aspects].
    Dettmeyer R; Reisenauer C
    Urologe A; 2017 Feb; 56(2):224-230. PubMed ID: 27525429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A decade of litigation regarding surgical informed consent in the Netherlands.
    Veerman MM; van der Woude LA; Tellier MA; Legemaate J; Scheltinga MR; Stassen LPS; Leclercq WKG
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Feb; 102(2):340-345. PubMed ID: 30173877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allegations of Failure to Obtain Informed Consent in Spinal Surgery Medical Malpractice Claims.
    Grauberger J; Kerezoudis P; Choudhry AJ; Alvi MA; Nassr A; Currier B; Bydon M
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Jun; 152(6):e170544. PubMed ID: 28445561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Malpractice litigation in cardiac surgery: Alleged injury mechanisms and outcomes.
    Eltorai AS
    J Card Surg; 2019 May; 34(5):323-328. PubMed ID: 30905069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.