These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28970508)

  • 1. Rapid Categorization of Human and Ape Faces in 9-Month-Old Infants Revealed by Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.
    Peykarjou S; Hoehl S; Pauen S; Rossion B
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12526. PubMed ID: 28970508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do 9-month-old infants categorize human and ape faces? A rapid repetition ERP study.
    Peykarjou S; Pauen S; Hoehl S
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Sep; 51(9):866-78. PubMed ID: 24890394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-month-olds' brain responses to upright and inverted faces and cars.
    Peykarjou S; Hoehl S
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2013; 38(4):272-80. PubMed ID: 23682666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Categorization, categorical perception, and asymmetry in infants' representation of face race.
    Anzures G; Quinn PC; Pascalis O; Slater AM; Lee K
    Dev Sci; 2010 Jul; 13(4):553-64. PubMed ID: 20590720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamics of neural representations when searching for exemplars and categories of human and non-human faces.
    Bayet L; Zinszer B; Pruitt Z; Aslin RN; Wu R
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13277. PubMed ID: 30185919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Phelps MT; Roberts WA
    J Comp Psychol; 1994 Jun; 108(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 8026162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steady-state visual-evoked response to upright and inverted geometrical faces: a magnetoencephalography study.
    Tsuruhara A; Inui K; Kakigi R
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Mar; 562():19-23. PubMed ID: 24412129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.
    Collins E; Robinson AK; Behrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():120-131. PubMed ID: 29966716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A single glance at natural face images generate larger and qualitatively different category-selective spatio-temporal signatures than other ecologically-relevant categories in the human brain.
    Jacques C; Retter TL; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 137():21-33. PubMed ID: 27138205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
    Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual learning and inversion effects: Recognition of prototype-defined familiar checkerboards.
    Civile C; Zhao D; Ku Y; Elchlepp H; Lavric A; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):144-61. PubMed ID: 24364668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural responses in a fast periodic visual stimulation paradigm reveal domain-general visual discrimination deficits in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Fisher K; Towler J; Rossion B; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():76-102. PubMed ID: 33099077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural adaptation provides evidence for categorical differences in processing of faces and Chinese characters: an ERP study of the N170.
    Fu S; Feng C; Guo S; Luo Y; Parasuraman R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41103. PubMed ID: 22911750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early cortical responses are sensitive to changes in face stimuli.
    Susac A; Ilmoniemi RJ; Pihko E; Ranken D; Supek S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():155-64. PubMed ID: 20510886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of scrambling upright and inverted faces on the N170.
    Civile C; Elchlepp H; McLaren R; Galang CM; Lavric A; McLaren I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2464-2476. PubMed ID: 30362407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.
    Sadeh B; Yovel G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):782-9. PubMed ID: 20558303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toddlers with Williams syndrome process upright but not inverted faces holistically.
    Cashon CH; Ha OR; DeNicola CA; Mervis CB
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2013 Nov; 43(11):2549-57. PubMed ID: 23494560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Origins of a stereotype: categorization of facial attractiveness by 6-month-old infants.
    Ramsey JL; Langlois JH; Hoss RA; Rubenstein AJ; Griffin AM
    Dev Sci; 2004 Apr; 7(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 15320380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociable effects of inter-stimulus interval and presentation duration on rapid face categorization.
    Retter TL; Jiang F; Webster MA; Rossion B
    Vision Res; 2018 Apr; 145():11-20. PubMed ID: 29581059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hey baby, what's "up"? One- and 3-month-olds experience faces primarily upright but non-upright faces offer the best views.
    Sugden NA; Moulson MC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):959-969. PubMed ID: 26912287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.