These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28970567)

  • 1. Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12500. PubMed ID: 28970567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of noise on integration of acoustic and electric hearing within and across ears.
    Willis S; Moore BCJ; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240752. PubMed ID: 33057396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of carrier bandwidth on integration of simulations of acoustic and electric hearing within or across ears.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL561. PubMed ID: 29289073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Whitaker G; Lee YS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):521-527. PubMed ID: 34965598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
    Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions Between Slopes of Residual Hearing and Frequency Maps in Simulated Bimodal and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Straw S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 67(1):282-295. PubMed ID: 38092067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of ipsilateral residual hearing for spatial hearing by bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Thomas M; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4960. PubMed ID: 36973380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
    Gifford RH; Sunderhaus LW; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108584. PubMed ID: 35985964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electroacoustic Stimulation.
    Li C; Kuhlmey M; Kim AH
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):311-322. PubMed ID: 30617011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.