These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28971224)

  • 1. Prospective and randomized clinical trial comparing transobturator versus retropubic sling in terms of efficacy and safety.
    Palos CC; Maturana AP; Ghersel FR; Fernandes CE; Oliveira E
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 28971224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized controlled trial comparing single-incision mini-sling and transobturator midurethral sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 3-year follow-up results.
    Pascom ALG; Djehdian LM; Bortolini MAT; Jarmy-Di Bella ZIK; Delroy CA; Tamanini JTN; Castro RA
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2184-2190. PubMed ID: 30088679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.
    Jurakova M; Huser M; Belkov I; Janku P; Hudecek R; Stourac P; Jarkovsky J; Ventruba P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 26630947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
    Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.
    Djehdian LM; Araujo MP; Takano CC; Del-Roy CA; Sartori MGF; Girão MJBC; Castro RA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 123(3):553-561. PubMed ID: 24499750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.
    Dogan O; Kaya AE; Pulatoglu C; Basbug A; Yassa M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29549394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The inside-out transobturator male sling for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: midterm results of a single-center prospective study.
    Leruth J; Waltregny D; de Leval J
    Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):608-15. PubMed ID: 22104591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Schellart RP; Zwolsman SE; Lucot JP; de Ridder DJMK; Dijkgraaf MGW; Roovers JWR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28577171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled trial comparing mini-sling with transobturator sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
    Maturana AP; Palos CC; Ghersel FR; Fernandes CE; Oliveira E
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1925-1931. PubMed ID: 31784809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term efficacy and complications of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing retropubic and transobturator mid-urethral slings: a prospective observational study.
    Offiah I; Freeman R;
    BJOG; 2021 Dec; 128(13):2191-2199. PubMed ID: 34478604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.
    Trabuco EC; Carranza D; El Nashar SA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Elliott DS; Linder BJ; Occhino J; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 31306327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and Efficacy of Single Incision Sling Versus Midurethral Sling in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Huser M; Hudecek R; Belkov I; Horvath I; Jarkovsky J; Tvarozek S
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Feb; 29(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 36735422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of surgical procedures utilizing autologous fascial and transobturator slings in patients with stress urinary incontinence.
    Brito LG; Rodrigues HL; Carvalho MA; Magnani PS; Lopes AH; Sabino-de-Freitas MM
    J Reprod Med; 2013; 58(1-2):19-24. PubMed ID: 23447914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
    Novara G; Artibani W; Barber MD; Chapple CR; Costantini E; Ficarra V; Hilton P; Nilsson CG; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2010 Aug; 58(2):218-38. PubMed ID: 20434257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five-year results of a randomized trial comparing retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.
    Laurikainen E; Valpas A; Aukee P; Kivelä A; Rinne K; Takala T; Nilsson CG
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1109-14. PubMed ID: 24508070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicentre randomized trial of the Ajust™ single-incision sling compared to the Align™ transobturator tape sling.
    Sabadell J; Palau-Gené M; Huguet E; Montero-Armengol A; Salicrú S; Poza JL
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jul; 28(7):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 27921162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.
    Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jun; 27(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 26670576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medium-term and long-term outcomes following placement of midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
    Tommaselli GA; Di Carlo C; Formisano C; Fabozzi A; Nappi C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1253-68. PubMed ID: 25990203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.
    Richter HE; Albo ME; Zyczynski HM; Kenton K; Norton PA; Sirls LT; Kraus SR; Chai TC; Lemack GE; Dandreo KJ; Varner RE; Menefee S; Ghetti C; Brubaker L; Nygaard I; Khandwala S; Rozanski TA; Johnson H; Schaffer J; Stoddard AM; Holley RL; Nager CW; Moalli P; Mueller E; Arisco AM; Corton M; Tennstedt S; Chang TD; Gormley EA; Litman HJ;
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Jun; 362(22):2066-76. PubMed ID: 20479459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comperative study for short-term surgical outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in obese and non-obese women with stress urinary incontinence
    Kokanalı MK; Cavkaytar S; Kokanalı D; Aksakal O; Doganay M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Nov; 36(8):1080-1085. PubMed ID: 27759469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.