These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28971502)

  • 1. Supervisor-trainee continuity and the quality of work-based assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek NL; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 51(12):1260-1268. PubMed ID: 28971502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Daily Encounter Cards-Evaluating the Quality of Documented Assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek N; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 8(4):601-604. PubMed ID: 27777675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT) to the traditional daily encounter card: measuring the quality of documented assessments.
    Endres K; Dudek N; McConnell M; Cheung WJ
    CJEM; 2021 May; 23(3):383-389. PubMed ID: 33512695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring gender influences in the quality of workplace-based assessments.
    Ingratta J; Dudek N; Lacroix L; Cortel-LeBlanc M; McConnell M; Cheung WJ
    CJEM; 2023 Jun; 25(6):475-480. PubMed ID: 37166679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) Score: Validity Evidence for a Scoring System Aimed at Rating Short, Workplace-Based Comments on Trainee Performance.
    Chan TM; Sebok-Syer SS; Sampson C; Monteiro S
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 32013584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supervisor assessment of clinical and professional competence of medical trainees: a reliability study using workplace data and a focused analytical literature review.
    McGill DA; van der Vleuten CP; Clarke MJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 Aug; 16(3):405-25. PubMed ID: 21607744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality in-training evaluation reports--does feedback drive faculty performance?
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Bandiera G; White J; Wood TJ
    Acad Med; 2013 Aug; 88(8):1129-34. PubMed ID: 23807095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Initial performance of a modified milestones global evaluation tool for semiannual evaluation of residents by faculty.
    Borman KR; Augustine R; Leibrandt T; Pezzi CM; Kukora JS
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(6):739-49. PubMed ID: 24209650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synchronous collection of multisource feedback evaluations does not increase inter-rater reliability.
    Garra G; Thode H
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 18 Suppl 2():S65-70. PubMed ID: 21999561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The process of feedback in workplace-based assessment: organisation, delivery, continuity.
    Pelgrim EA; Kramer AW; Mokkink HG; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2012 Jun; 46(6):604-12. PubMed ID: 22626052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Reliable are Single-Question Workplace-Based Assessments in Surgery?
    Gates RS; Krumm AE; Cate OT; Chen X; Marcotte K; Thelen AE; Deal SB; Alseidi A; Swanson D; George BC
    J Surg Educ; 2024 Jul; 81(7):967-972. PubMed ID: 38816336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality.
    Bismil R; Dudek NL; Wood TJ
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):724-32. PubMed ID: 24909534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively.
    Anderson DD; Long S; Thomas GW; Putnam MD; Bechtold JE; Karam MD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):874-81. PubMed ID: 26502107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical evaluation of the validity and the reliability of global competency constructs for supervisor assessment of junior medical trainees.
    McGill DA; van der Vleuten CP; Clarke MJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Oct; 18(4):701-25. PubMed ID: 23053869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repaying in Kind: Examination of the Reciprocity Effect in Faculty and Resident Evaluations.
    Gardner AK; Scott DJ
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):e91-e94. PubMed ID: 27211878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulation-based emergency medicine resident self-assessment.
    Sadosty AT; Bellolio MF; Laack TA; Luke A; Weaver A; Goyal DG
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 41(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 21835571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Entrustment Checkpoint: Clinical Supervisors' Perceptions of the Emergency Department Oral Case Presentation.
    Landreville JM; Cheung WJ; Hamelin A; Frank JR
    Teach Learn Med; 2019; 31(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 30706726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can I leave the theatre? A key to more reliable workplace-based assessment.
    Weller JM; Misur M; Nicolson S; Morris J; Ure S; Crossley J; Jolly B
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jun; 112(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 24638231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
    Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings.
    Massie J; Ali JM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 May; 21(2):455-73. PubMed ID: 26003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.