81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28971716)
1. Insignificant C1 effects cannot be called 'marginally significant'.
Di Russo F
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):70-71. PubMed ID: 28971716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional modulation of early visual areas.
Slotnick SD
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):1-3. PubMed ID: 29065816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of selective attention on the C1 ERP component: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qin N; Wiens S; Rauss K; Pourtois G
Psychophysiology; 2022 Dec; 59(12):e14123. PubMed ID: 35751845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Several studies with significant C1 attention effects survive critical analysis.
Slotnick SD
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):80-90. PubMed ID: 29065781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Still wanted: a reproducible demonstration of a genuine C1 attention effect.
Pitts MA; Hillyard SA
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):68-70. PubMed ID: 28975858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying and removing overlaps from adjacent components is important in investigations of C1 modulation by attention.
Qu Z; Ding Y
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):64-66. PubMed ID: 29025301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spatiotemporal characteristics of the C1 component and its modulation by attention.
Mohr KS; Kelly SP
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):71-74. PubMed ID: 28971714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
Foxe JJ; Strugstad EC; Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Pasieka W; Schroeder CE; McCourt ME
Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial summation revealed in the earliest visual evoked component C1 and the effect of attention on its linearity.
Chen J; Yu Q; Zhu Z; Peng Y; Fang F
J Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 115(1):500-9. PubMed ID: 26561595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does spatial attention modulate the C1 component? The jury continues to deliberate.
Baumgartner HM; Graulty CJ; Hillyard SA; Pitts MA
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):34-37. PubMed ID: 28956499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A sensory evoked response or precise anticipatory modulation? Mechanisms underlying the reported C1 modulation by spatial attention.
Ding Y
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):20-21. PubMed ID: 28891403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A controversy of whether the early C1 ERP is affected by attention.
Klein S
Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):21-23. PubMed ID: 28856951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functionally independent components of early event-related potentials in a visual spatial attention task.
Makeig S; Westerfield M; Townsend J; Jung TP; Courchesne E; Sejnowski TJ
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1999 Jul; 354(1387):1135-44. PubMed ID: 10466141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Event-related brain potentials in children with attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder: effects of stimulus deviancy and task relevance in the visual and auditory modality.
Kemner C; Verbaten MN; Koelega HS; Buitelaar JK; van der Gaag RJ; Camfferman G; van Engeland H
Biol Psychiatry; 1996 Sep; 40(6):522-34. PubMed ID: 8879473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gender differences in visual reflexive attention shifting: evidence from an ERP study.
Feng Q; Zheng Y; Zhang X; Song Y; Luo YJ; Li Y; Talhelm T
Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1401():59-65. PubMed ID: 21663895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
