These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28971788)
1. Prospective evaluation of flexible ureteroscopes with a novel evaluation tool. Bell JR; Penniston KL; Best SL; Nakada SY Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9004-9010. PubMed ID: 28971788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes. Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis. Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study. Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes. Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis. Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model. Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-use Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison. Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes. Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach. Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes. Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation. Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes. Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The digital flexible ureteroscope: in vitro assessment of optical characteristics. Zilberman DE; Lipkin ME; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Mancini JG; Raymundo ME; Zhong P; Preminger GM J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 21361823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impressive Performance: New Disposable Digital Ureteroscope Allows for Extreme Lower Pole Access and Use of 365 μm Holmium Laser Fiber. Leveillee RJ; Kelly EF J Endourol Case Rep; 2016; 2(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 27579436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes? Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]