These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28972019)

  • 21. [Need-based resource allocation--experiences with the RAWP formula in Great Britain].
    Brand H; Menke R
    Gesundheitswesen; 1997 Jul; 59(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 9333384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Constraints to implementing an equity-promoting staff allocation policy: understanding mid-level managers' and nurses' perspectives affecting implementation in South Africa.
    Scott V; Mathews V; Gilson L
    Health Policy Plan; 2012 Mar; 27(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 21450839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The politics of ideology vs. the reality of politics: the case of Britain's National Health Service in the 1980s.
    Klein R
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1984; 62(1):82-109. PubMed ID: 6559262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Equity of health resource allocation in Chongqing, China, in 2021: a cross-sectional study.
    Wei H; Jiang K; Zhao Y; Pu C
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e078987. PubMed ID: 38238051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Emergence of universal antiretroviral therapy coverage in South Africa: applying the advocacy coalition framework to refine the narratives and inform epidemic responses.
    Kadia BM; Dimala CA; Njefi KP
    Pan Afr Med J; 2022; 42():6. PubMed ID: 35685382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Making access to health care more equal: the role of general medical services.
    Bevan G; Charlton J
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Sep; 295(6601):764-7. PubMed ID: 3119028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.
    O'Flaherty M; Lloyd-Williams F; Capewell S; Boland A; Maden M; Collins B; Bandosz P; Hyseni L; Kypridemos C
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 May; 25(35):1-234. PubMed ID: 34076574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coalitions and conflict in the National Health Service: some implications for general management.
    Thompson D
    Sociol Health Illn; 1987 Jun; 9(2):127-53. PubMed ID: 10282879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework to understand EU pharmaceutical policy.
    Brooks E
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Nov; 28(suppl_3):11-14. PubMed ID: 30383259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gatekeeping in Britain's "new" National Health Service.
    Kessel R
    Bus Prof Ethics J; 1993; 12(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11659622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Control, participation, and the British National Health Service.
    Klein R
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1979; 57(1):70-94. PubMed ID: 253198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reforming Britain's National Health Service: an application of Engelhardtian justice.
    Kessel R
    Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):121-32. PubMed ID: 11651032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Justice System Reform for Health Equity: A Mixed Methods Examination of Collaborating for Equity and Justice Principles in a Grassroots Organizing Coalition.
    Cooper DG; Christens BD
    Health Educ Behav; 2019 Oct; 46(1_suppl):62S-70S. PubMed ID: 31549558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Governance for planetary health equity-the Planetary Health Equity Hothouse project.
    Friel S; Hunnisett C; Faerron Guzmán CA; Arthur M
    Lancet Planet Health; 2024 Apr; 8 Suppl 1():S15. PubMed ID: 38632910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient choice and equity in the British National Health Service: towards developing an alternative framework.
    Fotaki M
    Sociol Health Illn; 2010 Sep; 32(6):898-913. PubMed ID: 20553424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?
    McKee M; Figueras J
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7032):691-4. PubMed ID: 8597740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. NHS heart transplants to continue.
    J Med Ethics; 1984 Jun; 10(2):103. PubMed ID: 11644142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Big bang health care reform--does it work?: the case of Britain's 1991 National Health Service reforms.
    Klein R
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(3):299-337. PubMed ID: 7659043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Analysis of the national DST/Aids policy from the perspective of advocacy coalition framework (ACF)].
    Almeida AIS; Ribeiro JM; Bastos FI
    Cien Saude Colet; 2022 Mar; 27(3):837-848. PubMed ID: 35293462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. NICE and Fair? Health Technology Assessment Policy Under the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 1999-2018.
    Charlton V
    Health Care Anal; 2020 Sep; 28(3):193-227. PubMed ID: 31325000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.