339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28972823)
1. Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Martin-Fernandez E; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Dec; 43(6):419-428. PubMed ID: 28972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Martin-Fernandez E; Brizuela-Velasco A; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 9(5):371-380. PubMed ID: 29142645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D Finite Element Analysis to Assess the Stress Distribution Pattern in Mandibular Implant-supported Overdenture with Different Bar Heights.
Joshi S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 31597798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of Implant Inclination on Stress Distribution in Mandibular Overdentures.
Ebadian B; Mosharraf R; Khodaeian N
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 23574403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures.
Oda K; Kanazawa M; Takeshita S; Minakuchi S
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27677217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Implant Height Differences on Different Attachment Types and Peri-Implant Bone in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: 3D Finite Element Study.
Ozan O; Ramoglu S
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):e50-9. PubMed ID: 24471769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Mandibles with Different Bone Types Loaded by Implant-Supported Overdentures with Different Localizations of Locator Attachments.
Yıldırım RS; Buyukerkmen EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):851-862. PubMed ID: 34698710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological-data-based finite-element stress analysis of mandibular bone with implant-supported overdenture.
Shigemitsu R; Yoda N; Ogawa T; Kawata T; Gunji Y; Yamakawa Y; Ikeda K; Sasaki K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Nov; 54():44-52. PubMed ID: 25212117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress distribution of one-piece and two-piece mini-Implant overdentures with various attachment systems and diameters: A finite element analysis.
Trang BNH; Kanazawa M; Murakami N; Wakabayashi N; Hada T; Sahaprom N; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S
J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 36372437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
