887 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28973514)
1. Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Greuter MJE; de Klerk CM; Meijer GA; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
Ann Intern Med; 2017 Oct; 167(8):544-554. PubMed ID: 28973514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) versus colonoscopy for surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study.
Cross AJ; Wooldrage K; Robbins EC; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Stenson I; Prendergast A; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran SP; Atkin WS
Gut; 2019 Sep; 68(9):1642-1652. PubMed ID: 30538097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.
Knudsen AB; Hur C; Gazelle GS; Schrag D; McFarland EG; Kuntz KM
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Nov; 157(9):611-20. PubMed ID: 23128861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Knudsen AB; Ladabaum U
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 171(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 31546257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhong GC; Sun WP; Wan L; Hu JJ; Hao FB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Mar; 91(3):684-697.e15. PubMed ID: 31790657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.
Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA
Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A
Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Hees F; Habbema JD; Meester RG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG
Ann Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 160(11):750-9. PubMed ID: 24887616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.
Ebner D; Kisiel J; Barnieh L; Sharma R; Smith NJ; Estes C; Vahdat V; Ozbay AB; Limburg P; Fendrick AM
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 37752872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and risk score.
Sekiguchi M; Igarashi A; Sakamoto T; Saito Y; Esaki M; Matsuda T
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 35(9):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 32167186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The multitarget fecal immunochemical test versus the fecal immunochemical test for programmatic colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional intervention study with paired design.
Wisse PHA; de Klaver W; van Wifferen F; Meiqari L; Bierkens M; Greuter MJE; Carvalho B; van Leerdam ME; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; Coupé VMH; de Wit M; Meijer GA
BMC Cancer; 2022 Dec; 22(1):1299. PubMed ID: 36503495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Bosch LJW; Melotte V; Carvalho B; van Engeland M; Meijer GA; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):504-512.e11. PubMed ID: 28733262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Projecting total costs and health consequences of increasing mt-sDNA utilization for colorectal cancer screening from the payer and integrated delivery network perspectives.
Hathway JM; Miller-Wilson LA; Jensen IS; Ozbay B; Regan C; Jena AB; Weinstein MC; Parks PD
J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 32063100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal use of colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test for population-based colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using Japanese data.
Sekiguchi M; Igarashi A; Matsuda T; Matsumoto M; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Kakugawa Y; Yamamoto S; Saito H; Saito Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 26685321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
