BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

867 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28973514)

  • 21. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of the faecal immunochemical test at a range of positivity thresholds compared with the guaiac faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Murphy J; Halloran S; Gray A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017186. PubMed ID: 29079605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.
    Peterse EFP; Meester RGS; de Jonge L; Omidvari AH; Alarid-Escudero F; Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Feb; 113(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 32761199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Molecular stool testing as an alternative for surveillance colonoscopy: a cross-sectional cohort study.
    van Lanschot MC; Carvalho B; Coupé VM; van Engeland M; Dekker E; Meijer GA
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):116. PubMed ID: 28173852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test.
    Senore C; Hassan C; Regge D; Pagano E; Iussich G; Correale L; Segnan N
    J Med Screen; 2019 Jun; 26(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 30180780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The comparative cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening using faecal immunochemical test vs. colonoscopy.
    Wong MC; Ching JY; Chan VC; Sung JJ
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13568. PubMed ID: 26338314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.
    Sharma T
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():70-76. PubMed ID: 32179290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effectiveness, benefit harm and cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Austria.
    Jahn B; Sroczynski G; Bundo M; Mühlberger N; Puntscher S; Todorovic J; Rochau U; Oberaigner W; Koffijberg H; Fischer T; Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Öfner D; Renner F; Jonas M; Hackl M; Ferlitsch M; Siebert U;
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):209. PubMed ID: 31805871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
    Sharp L; Tilson L; Whyte S; O'Ceilleachair A; Walsh C; Usher C; Tappenden P; Chilcott J; Staines A; Barry M; Comber H
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Feb; 106(5):805-16. PubMed ID: 22343624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of differences in adenoma and proximal serrated polyp detection rate on the long-term effectiveness of FIT-based colorectal cancer screening.
    Bronzwaer MES; Greuter MJE; Bleijenberg AGC; IJspeert JEG; Dekker E; Coupé VMH
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):465. PubMed ID: 29695244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost-effectiveness of alternative colonoscopy surveillance strategies to mitigate metachronous colorectal cancer incidence.
    Erenay FS; Alagoz O; Banerjee R; Said A; Cima RR
    Cancer; 2016 Aug; 122(16):2560-70. PubMed ID: 27248907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.
    Gini A; Zauber AG; Cenin DR; Omidvari AH; Hempstead SE; Fink AK; Lowenfels AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Feb; 154(3):556-567.e18. PubMed ID: 29102616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Meester RGS; Gupta S; Schoen RE
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Jul; 157(1):137-148. PubMed ID: 30930021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fecal occult blood testing when colonoscopy capacity is limited.
    Wilschut JA; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Hol L; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; van Ballegooijen M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Dec; 103(23):1741-51. PubMed ID: 22076285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
    Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).
    Breekveldt ECH; Toes-Zoutendijk E; de Jonge L; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; van Kemenade FJ; van Vuuren AJ; Ramakers CRB; Nagtegaal ID; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):45. PubMed ID: 36814185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.