These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28973581)

  • 1. Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy in Post-Laminectomy Syndrome.
    Paul AR; Kumar V; Roth S; Gooch MR; Pilitsis JG
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Dec; 81(6):1011-1015. PubMed ID: 28973581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation.
    Sabourin S; Tram J; Sheldon BL; Pilitsis JG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Aug; 35(2):243-250. PubMed ID: 34087802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Sleep Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain Disorders.
    Johansen PM; Trujillo FA; Hagerty V; Harland T; Davis G; Pilitsis JG
    Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2023; 101(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 36574755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
    McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Options: A Prospective, Open-Label Study of High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Back and Leg Pain.
    Benyamin R; Galan V; Hatheway J; Kim P; Choi D; Falowski S; Calodney A; Sweet J; Yu C; Kapural L; Provenzano D
    Pain Physician; 2020 Jan; 23(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 32013282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Pain, Functional, and Quality of Life Scales in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients.
    Park KB; Shin JS; Lee J; Lee YJ; Kim MR; Lee JH; Shin KM; Shin BC; Cho JH; Ha IH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(8):E474-E481. PubMed ID: 27792107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical Resection of Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumors: Patient Reported Outcomes and Minimum Clinically Important Difference.
    Zuckerman SL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Parker SL; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Hale AT; McGirt MJ; Cheng JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Dec; 41(24):1925-1932. PubMed ID: 27111764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
    Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of the minimum improvement in pain, disability, and health state associated with cost-effectiveness: introduction of the concept of minimum cost-effective difference.
    Parker SL; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Dec; 71(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 22986596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial.
    Kapural L; Yu C; Doust MW; Gliner BE; Vallejo R; Sitzman BT; Amirdelfan K; Morgan DM; Yearwood TL; Bundschu R; Yang T; Benyamin R; Burgher AH
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Nov; 79(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 27584814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability Is a Suitable Predictor of Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Fusion Patients.
    Geoghegan CE; Mohan S; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e94-e100. PubMed ID: 34023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-World Analysis: Long-Term Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation With Different Waveforms for Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.
    Do TT; Smet I; Jerjir A; Vandamme K; Devos M; Van Buyten JP
    Pain Pract; 2021 Feb; 21(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 32964562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.