These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28973820)

  • 1. Designing Graphs that Promote Both Risk Understanding and Behavior Change.
    Okan Y; Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W
    Risk Anal; 2018 May; 38(5):929-946. PubMed ID: 28973820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability Size Matters: The Effect of Foreground-Only versus Foreground+Background Graphs on Risk Aversion Diminishes with Larger Probabilities.
    Okan Y; Stone ER; Parillo J; Bruine de Bruin W; Parker AM
    Risk Anal; 2020 Apr; 40(4):771-788. PubMed ID: 31907975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making.
    Stone ER; Bruine de Bruin W; Wilkins AM; Boker EM; MacDonald Gibson J
    Risk Anal; 2017 Apr; 37(4):612-628. PubMed ID: 27862121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two people, one graph: the effect of rotated viewpoints on accessibility of data visualizations.
    Müller T; Hesse FW; Meyerhoff HS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Apr; 6(1):31. PubMed ID: 33847833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes.
    Stone ER; Gabard AR; Groves AE; Lipkus IM
    J Health Commun; 2015; 20(10):1230-41. PubMed ID: 26065633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Sudharsanan N; Favaretti C; Hachaturyan V; Bärnighausen T; Vandormael A
    Trials; 2021 Sep; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 34488843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Complexity of Optimal Design of Temporally Connected Graphs.
    Akrida EC; Gąsieniec L; Mertzios GB; Spirakis PG
    Theory Comput Syst; 2017; 61(3):907-944. PubMed ID: 32025196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.
    Asada Y; Abel H; Skedgel C; Warner G
    Milbank Q; 2017 Dec; 95(4):801-835. PubMed ID: 29226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making.
    Cardoso RL; Leite RO; de Aquino AC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160443. PubMed ID: 27508519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Graph schema and best graph type to compare discrete groups: Bar, line, and pie.
    Zhao F; Gaschler R
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():991420. PubMed ID: 36600703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bar graphs depicting averages are perceptually misinterpreted: the within-the-bar bias.
    Newman GE; Scholl BJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 22648655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Charting the landscape of graphical displays for meta-analysis and systematic reviews: a comprehensive review, taxonomy, and feature analysis.
    Kossmeier M; Tran US; Voracek M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 32028897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating Phase Change Lines and Labels into Graphs in Microsoft Excel®.
    Fuller TC; Dubuque EM
    Behav Anal Pract; 2019 Mar; 12(1):293-299. PubMed ID: 30918794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The visual communication of risk.
    Lipkus IM; Hollands JG
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1999; (25):149-63. PubMed ID: 10854471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving risk understanding across ability levels: Encouraging active processing with dynamic icon arrays.
    Okan Y; Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET; Maldonado A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Jun; 21(2):178-94. PubMed ID: 25938975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introducing hat graphs.
    Witt JK
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Aug; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 31414198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Graphical literacy: the quality of graphs in a large-circulation journal.
    Cooper RJ; Schriger DL; Close RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Sep; 40(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 12192357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicating Uncertainties About the Effects of Medical Interventions Using Different Display Formats.
    McDowell M; Kause A
    Risk Anal; 2021 Dec; 41(12):2220-2239. PubMed ID: 34109678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.