251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28973955)
1. Phenotypic variation explains food web structural patterns.
Gibert JP; DeLong JP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(42):11187-11192. PubMed ID: 28973955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What drives interaction strengths in complex food webs? A test with feeding rates of a generalist stream predator.
Preston DL; Henderson JS; Falke LP; Segui LM; Layden TJ; Novak M
Ecology; 2018 Jul; 99(7):1591-1601. PubMed ID: 29738085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the effects of trophic complexity on a keystone predator by disassembling a partial intraguild predation food web.
Davenport JM; Chalcraft DR
J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 21950407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Food-web interaction strength distributions are conserved by greater variation between than within predator-prey pairs.
Preston DL; Falke LP; Henderson JS; Novak M
Ecology; 2019 Oct; 100(10):e02816. PubMed ID: 31287561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. River food webs: an integrative approach to bottom-up flow webs, top-down impact webs, and trophic position.
Benke AC
Ecology; 2018 Jun; 99(6):1370-1381. PubMed ID: 29604060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability.
Otto SB; Rall BC; Brose U
Nature; 2007 Dec; 450(7173):1226-9. PubMed ID: 18097408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predator effects on a detritus-based food web are primarily mediated by non-trophic interactions.
Majdi N; Boiché A; Traunspurger W; Lecerf A
J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jul; 83(4):953-62. PubMed ID: 24286440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stepping in Elton's footprints: a general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems.
Riede JO; Brose U; Ebenman B; Jacob U; Thompson R; Townsend CR; Jonsson T
Ecol Lett; 2011 Feb; 14(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 21199248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties.
Van De Walle R; Logghe G; Haas N; Massol F; Vandegehuchte ML; Bonte D
J Anim Ecol; 2023 Apr; 92(4):913-924. PubMed ID: 36807906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How does abundance scale with body size in coupled size-structured food webs?
Blanchard JL; Jennings S; Law R; Castle MD; McCloghrie P; Rochet MJ; Benoît E
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):270-80. PubMed ID: 19120607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.
Klecka J; Boukal DS
J Anim Ecol; 2013 Sep; 82(5):1031-41. PubMed ID: 23869526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prey Limitation Drives Variation in Allometric Scaling of Predator-Prey Interactions.
Costa-Pereira R; Araújo MS; Olivier RDS; Souza FL; Rudolf VHW
Am Nat; 2018 Oct; 192(4):E139-E149. PubMed ID: 30205026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Food webs: ordering species according to body size yields high degree of intervality.
Zook AE; Eklof A; Jacob U; Allesina S
J Theor Biol; 2011 Feb; 271(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 21144853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seasonal shifts in predator body size diversity and trophic interactions in size-structured predator-prey systems.
Rudolf VH
J Anim Ecol; 2012 May; 81(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 22191419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predator traits determine food-web architecture across ecosystems.
Brose U; Archambault P; Barnes AD; Bersier LF; Boy T; Canning-Clode J; Conti E; Dias M; Digel C; Dissanayake A; Flores AAV; Fussmann K; Gauzens B; Gray C; Häussler J; Hirt MR; Jacob U; Jochum M; Kéfi S; McLaughlin O; MacPherson MM; Latz E; Layer-Dobra K; Legagneux P; Li Y; Madeira C; Martinez ND; Mendonça V; Mulder C; Navarrete SA; O'Gorman EJ; Ott D; Paula J; Perkins D; Piechnik D; Pokrovsky I; Raffaelli D; Rall BC; Rosenbaum B; Ryser R; Silva A; Sohlström EH; Sokolova N; Thompson MSA; Thompson RM; Vermandele F; Vinagre C; Wang S; Wefer JM; Williams RJ; Wieters E; Woodward G; Iles AC
Nat Ecol Evol; 2019 Jun; 3(6):919-927. PubMed ID: 31110252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predator Persistence through Variability of Resource Productivity in Tritrophic Systems.
Soudijn FH; de Roos AM
Am Nat; 2017 Dec; 190(6):844-853. PubMed ID: 29166154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temperature dependence of trophic interactions are driven by asymmetry of species responses and foraging strategy.
Dell AI; Pawar S; Savage VM
J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 23692182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Food web persistence is enhanced by non-trophic interactions.
Hammill E; Kratina P; Vos M; Petchey OL; Anholt BR
Oecologia; 2015 Jun; 178(2):549-56. PubMed ID: 25656586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Convergence of trophic interaction strengths in grassland food webs through metabolic scaling of herbivore biomass.
Schmitz OJ; Price JR
J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1330-6. PubMed ID: 21722105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining and measuring trophic role similarity in food webs using regular equivalence.
Luczkovich JJ; Borgatti SP; Johnson JC; Everett MG
J Theor Biol; 2003 Feb; 220(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 12468282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
