586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28974230)
1. Effect of day 3 embryo morphometrics and morphokinetics on survival and implantation after slow freezing-thawing and after vitrification-warming: a retrospective cohort study.
Fernandez Gallardo E; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe T; Debrock S
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Oct; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28974230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of embryo morphology and morphometrics on implantation of vitrified day 3 embryos after warming: a retrospective cohort study.
Fernandez Gallardo E; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe T; Debrock S
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2016 Jul; 14(1):40. PubMed ID: 27475526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.
Zhu HY; Xue YM; Yang LY; Jiang LY; Ling C; Tong XM; Zhang SY
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Sep; 32(9):1371-7. PubMed ID: 26238389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of embryo intactness and developmental potential following slow freezing and vitrification.
Yu L; Jia C; Lan Y; Song R; Zhou L; Li Y; Liang Y; Wang S
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2017 Oct; 63(5):285-293. PubMed ID: 28795845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of modified quarter laser-assisted zona thinning on the implantation rate per embryo in frozen/vitrified-thawed/warmed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Spiessens C; Willemen D; De Loecker P; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1997-2007. PubMed ID: 21659315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
Kahraman S; Candan ZN
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of two different thaw protocols on outcomes of vitrified cleavage-stage embryos transfer.
Zhang XJ; Yang YZ; Lv Q; Wang Y; Cao XH; Li XJ; Liao MX; Guo C
Cryo Letters; 2012; 33(6):411-7. PubMed ID: 23250400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing.
Levron J; Leibovitz O; Brengauz M; Gitman H; Yerushalmi GM; Katorza E; Gat I; Elizur SE
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Mar; 30(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 24397397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The freezing method of cleavage stage embryos has no impact on the weight of the newborns.
Kaartinen N; Kananen K; Huhtala H; Keränen S; Tinkanen H
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Mar; 33(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 26749388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A monocentric analysis of the efficacy of extracellular cryoprotectants in unfrozen solutions for cleavage stage embryos.
Capodanno F; Daolio J; De Feo G; Falbo A; Morini D; Nicoli A; Braglia L; Villani M; La Sala GB; Parmegiani L; Aguzzoli L
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Oct; 17(1):84. PubMed ID: 31656205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing method and type of endometrial preparation].
Pouget O; Scalici E; Hoa-Ferrieres A; Deutsch-Bringer S; Gala A; Dechaud H; Hamamah S
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 25708846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mitochondrial bioenergetic profiles of warmed bovine blastocysts are typically altered after cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification.
Kurzella J; Miskel D; Rings F; Tholen E; Tesfaye D; Schellander K; Salilew-Wondim D; Held-Hoelker E; Große-Brinkhaus C; Hoelker M
Theriogenology; 2024 Jan; 214():21-32. PubMed ID: 37839094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cryopreservation method affects DNA fragmentation in trophectoderm and the speed of re-expansion in bovine blastocysts.
Inaba Y; Miyashita S; Somfai T; Geshi M; Matoba S; Dochi O; Nagai T
Cryobiology; 2016 Apr; 72(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 26996887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Contribution of embryo vitrification procedure to ART efficiency].
Sifer C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Oct; 42(10):721-4. PubMed ID: 25192924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
