These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28975675)

  • 21. Introducing "best single template" models as reference baseline for the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO).
    Haas J; Gumienny R; Barbato A; Ackermann F; Tauriello G; Bertoni M; Studer G; Smolinski A; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1378-1387. PubMed ID: 31571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CryptoSite: Expanding the Druggable Proteome by Characterization and Prediction of Cryptic Binding Sites.
    Cimermancic P; Weinkam P; Rettenmaier TJ; Bichmann L; Keedy DA; Woldeyes RA; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Demerdash ON; Mitchell JC; Wells JA; Fraser JS; Sali A
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Feb; 428(4):709-719. PubMed ID: 26854760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An accurate, sensitive, and scalable method to identify functional sites in protein structures.
    Yao H; Kristensen DM; Mihalek I; Sowa ME; Shaw C; Kimmel M; Kavraki L; Lichtarge O
    J Mol Biol; 2003 Feb; 326(1):255-61. PubMed ID: 12547207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Designing template-free predictor for targeting protein-ligand binding sites with classifier ensemble and spatial clustering.
    Yu DJ; Hu J; Yang J; Shen HB; Tang J; Yang JY
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(4):994-1008. PubMed ID: 24334392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can We Rely on Computational Predictions To Correctly Identify Ligand Binding Sites on Novel Protein Drug Targets? Assessment of Binding Site Prediction Methods and a Protocol for Validation of Predicted Binding Sites.
    Broomhead NK; Soliman ME
    Cell Biochem Biophys; 2017 Mar; 75(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 27796788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Holo Protein Conformation Generation from Apo Structures by Ligand Binding Site Refinement.
    Zhang J; Li H; Zhao X; Wu Q; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5806-5820. PubMed ID: 36342197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.
    McGovern SL; Shoichet BK
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2895-907. PubMed ID: 12825931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms.
    Hetényi C; van der Spoel D
    Protein Sci; 2011 May; 20(5):880-93. PubMed ID: 21413095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relating destabilizing regions to known functional sites in proteins.
    Dessailly BH; Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 8():141. PubMed ID: 17470296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The challenge of modeling protein assemblies: the CASP12-CAPRI experiment.
    Lensink MF; Velankar S; Baek M; Heo L; Seok C; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():257-273. PubMed ID: 29127686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. BindML/BindML+: Detecting Protein-Protein Interaction Interface Propensity from Amino Acid Substitution Patterns.
    Wei Q; La D; Kihara D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():279-289. PubMed ID: 27914057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets.
    Kopp J; Bordoli L; Battey JN; Kiefer F; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():38-56. PubMed ID: 17894352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prediction of interaction sites from apo 3D structures when the holo conformation is different.
    Murga LF; Ondrechen MJ; Ringe D
    Proteins; 2008 Aug; 72(3):980-92. PubMed ID: 18300225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What method to use for protein-protein docking?
    Porter KA; Desta I; Kozakov D; Vajda S
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2019 Apr; 55():1-7. PubMed ID: 30711743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9.
    Mariani V; Kiefer F; Schmidt T; Haas J; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10():37-58. PubMed ID: 22002823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of ligand binding sites using homologous structures and conservation at CASP8.
    Wass MN; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):147-51. PubMed ID: 19626715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Challenging the state of the art in protein structure prediction: Highlights of experimental target structures for the 10th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction Experiment CASP10.
    Kryshtafovych A; Moult J; Bales P; Bazan JF; Biasini M; Burgin A; Chen C; Cochran FV; Craig TK; Das R; Fass D; Garcia-Doval C; Herzberg O; Lorimer D; Luecke H; Ma X; Nelson DC; van Raaij MJ; Rohwer F; Segall A; Seguritan V; Zeth K; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):26-42. PubMed ID: 24318984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
    Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scoring optimisation of unbound protein-protein docking including protein binding site predictions.
    Schneider S; Zacharias M
    J Mol Recognit; 2012 Jan; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 22213447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.