These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28975717)

  • 1. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
    Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Funnel plots may show asymmetry in the absence of publication bias with continuous outcomes dependent on baseline risk: presentation of a new publication bias test.
    Doleman B; Freeman SC; Lund JN; Williams JP; Sutton AJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Jul; 11(4):522-534. PubMed ID: 32362052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graphical augmentations to sample-size-based funnel plot in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Sep; 10(3):376-388. PubMed ID: 30664834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
    Simmonds M
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis.
    Sterne JA; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):1046-55. PubMed ID: 11576817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Barendregt JJ; Doi SAR
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2018 Dec; 16(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 29621038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LFK index does not reliably detect small-study effects in meta-analysis: A simulation study.
    Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Semaca C
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):603-615. PubMed ID: 38467140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed.
    Deeks JJ; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):882-93. PubMed ID: 16085191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
    Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.
    Egger M; Davey Smith G; Schneider M; Minder C
    BMJ; 1997 Sep; 315(7109):629-34. PubMed ID: 9310563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.
    Zwetsloot PP; Van Der Naald M; Sena ES; Howells DW; IntHout J; De Groot JA; Chamuleau SA; MacLeod MR; Wever KE
    Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28884685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does under-reporting of negative and inconclusive results affect the false-positive rate in meta-analysis? A simulation study.
    Kicinski M
    BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e004831. PubMed ID: 25168036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Stanley TD; Abrams KR; Peters JL; Cooper NJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 19138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Song F; Khan KS; Dinnes J; Sutton AJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 11914301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey.
    Souza JP; Pileggi C; Cecatti JG
    Reprod Health; 2007 Apr; 4():3. PubMed ID: 17437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.