These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 289762)

  • 1. Bioassay of an experimental liner for composite resin restorations.
    McGinnis JP; Hembree JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Sep; 42(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 289762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reactions of dentin and pulp to drugs and restorative materials.
    Frank RM
    J Dent Res; 1975 Jun; 54 Spec No B():B176-87. PubMed ID: 1094043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biological testing of intermediate lining substances].
    Baume LJ; Holz J; Fiore-Donno G
    J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1972 Jan; 38(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 4500575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulpal response in rat molars to a new restorative material without a liner.
    Cotton WR; Leonard EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1967 Nov; 18(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 5234316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Pulp response to a posterior composite resin restoration with enamel etching or with enamel and dentin etching].
    Takamori Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1986 Feb; 86(2):115-71. PubMed ID: 3520833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histopathologic response of the human dental pulp to restorative resins.
    Suarez CL; Stanley HR; Gilmore HW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1970 Apr; 80(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 4907040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criteria for biologic evaluation of anterior tooth filling materials.
    Langeland K
    Int Dent J; 1967 Jun; 17(2):405-40. PubMed ID: 4168512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps.
    Cox CF; Keall CL; Keall HJ; Ostro E; Bergenholtz G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3468243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of esthetic filling materials on the dental pulp in dogs].
    Seremet M; Tahmisćija H; Cvetković T
    Stomatol Vjesn; 1985; 14(3-4):65-71. PubMed ID: 2949401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Pulp response to a spherical sub-microfilled resin and its effectiveness in pulp protection with a dentin-adhesive lining material].
    Fujita T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1986 Apr; 86(4):587-624. PubMed ID: 3018938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal response to a new adhesive restorative resin.
    Inokoshi S; Iwaku M; Fusayama T
    J Dent Res; 1982 Aug; 61(8):1014-9. PubMed ID: 6955336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primate pulpal response to ultraviolet light-polymerized direct-bonding material systems.
    Myers CL; Stanley HR; Heyde JB; Chamberlain J
    J Dent Res; 1976; 55(6):1118-24. PubMed ID: 826551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of materials used in pediatric dentistry on the pulp: a review of the literature.
    Good DL
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1999 Nov; 27(11):861-7. PubMed ID: 10726556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restorative pulpal and repair responses.
    Murray PE; About I; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Apr; 132(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 11315379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protective effect of polystyrene liners for composite resin restorations.
    Brännström M; Nordenvall KJ; Torstenson B; Hedström KG; Wåhlstam H
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Mar; 49(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 6573479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.