203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28976213)
1. Virtual Apartment-Based Stroop for assessing distractor inhibition in healthy aging.
Parsons TD; Barnett M
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019; 26(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28976213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual apartment stroop task: Comparison with computerized and traditional stroop tasks.
Parsons TD; Barnett MD
J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Nov; 309():35-40. PubMed ID: 30144496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bimodal Virtual Reality Stroop for Assessing Distractor Inhibition in Autism Spectrum Disorders.
Parsons TD; Carlew AR
J Autism Dev Disord; 2016 Apr; 46(4):1255-67. PubMed ID: 26614084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of executive function in adolescence: a comparison of traditional and virtual reality tools.
Lalonde G; Henry M; Drouin-Germain A; Nolin P; Beauchamp MH
J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Sep; 219(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 23867080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.
Portugal ACA; Afonso AS; Caldas AL; Maturana W; Mocaiber I; Machado-Pinheiro W
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():234-243. PubMed ID: 30343096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should we stop thinking about inhibition? Searching for individual and age differences in inhibition ability.
Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Oberauer K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):501-526. PubMed ID: 28956944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance on naturalistic virtual reality tasks depends on global cognitive functioning as assessed via traditional neurocognitive tests.
Oliveira J; Gamito P; Alghazzawi DM; Fardoun HM; Rosa PJ; Sousa T; Picareli LF; Morais D; Lopes P
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2018; 25(6):555-561. PubMed ID: 28805447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of immersive virtual reality with traditional neuropsychological measures in the assessment of executive functions.
Davison SMC; Deeprose C; Terbeck S
Acta Neuropsychiatr; 2018 Apr; 30(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 28482936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-modal interference-control is reduced in childhood but maintained in aging: A cohort study of stimulus- and response-interference in cross-modal and unimodal Stroop tasks.
Hirst RJ; Kicks EC; Allen HA; Cragg L
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):553-572. PubMed ID: 30945905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of task repetition but no transfer of inhibitory control training in healthy adults.
Talanow T; Ettinger U
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jun; 187():37-53. PubMed ID: 29772392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibition impairments in Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and healthy aging: effect of congruency proportion in a Stroop task.
Bélanger S; Belleville S; Gauthier S
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):581-90. PubMed ID: 19879885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.
Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1695-1716. PubMed ID: 29019064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A fNIRS investigation of switching and inhibition during the modified Stroop task in younger and older adults.
Laguë-Beauvais M; Brunet J; Gagnon L; Lesage F; Bherer L
Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():485-95. PubMed ID: 23000257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual reality Stroop task for assessment of supervisory attentional processing.
Parsons TD; Courtney CG; Dawson ME
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2013; 35(8):812-26. PubMed ID: 23961959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aging effects in response inhibition: general slowing without decline in inhibitory functioning.
Yano M
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2011 Dec; 40(1-2):129-39. PubMed ID: 25665217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term habitual physical activity is associated with lower distractibility in a Stroop interference task in aging: Behavioral and ERP evidence.
Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
Brain Cogn; 2015 Aug; 98():87-101. PubMed ID: 26160263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.
Augustinova M; Clarys D; Spatola N; Ferrand L
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):767-774. PubMed ID: 29372512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual but not fragile: individual differences in task control predict Stroop facilitation.
Kalanthroff E; Henik A
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 23416541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-related effects on a novel dual-task Stroop paradigm.
Ward N; Hussey E; Alzahabi R; Gaspar JG; Kramer AF
PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247923. PubMed ID: 33651855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of virtual environments in a multi-disciplinary day neurorehabilitation program to improve executive functioning using the Stroop task.
Dahdah MN; Bennett M; Prajapati P; Parsons TD; Sullivan E; Driver S
NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(4):721-734. PubMed ID: 29254114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
