239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28976493)
21. A comparison of physical activity from Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers worn on the dominant and non-dominant wrist.
Buchan DS; McSeveney F; McLellan G
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2019 Jan; 39(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 30058765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of physical behavior estimates from three different thigh-worn accelerometers brands: a proof-of-concept for the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting, and Sleep consortium (ProPASS).
Crowley P; Skotte J; Stamatakis E; Hamer M; Aadahl M; Stevens ML; Rangul V; Mork PJ; Holtermann A
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Aug; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 31419998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure.
Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH
Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Stepping up with GGIR: Validity of step cadence derived from wrist-worn research-grade accelerometers using the verisense step count algorithm.
Rowlands AV; Maylor B; Dawkins NP; Dempsey PC; Edwardson CL; Soczawa-Stronczyk AA; Bocian M; Patterson MR; Yates T
J Sports Sci; 2022 Oct; 40(19):2182-2190. PubMed ID: 36384415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validating the Sedentary Sphere method in children: Does wrist or accelerometer brand matter?
Hurter L; Rowlands AV; Fairclough SJ; Gibbon KC; Knowles ZR; Porcellato LA; Cooper-Ryan AM; Boddy LM
J Sports Sci; 2019 Aug; 37(16):1910-1918. PubMed ID: 31012798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Dillon CB; Fitzgerald AP; Kearney PM; Perry IJ; Rennie KL; Kozarski R; Phillips CM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0109913. PubMed ID: 27149674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The validity of the GENEActiv wrist-worn accelerometer for measuring adult sedentary time in free living.
Pavey TG; Gomersall SR; Clark BK; Brown WJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2016 May; 19(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 25956687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Equivalency of four research-grade movement sensors to assess movement behaviors and its implications for population surveillance.
Migueles JH; Molina-Garcia P; Torres-Lopez LV; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Rowlands AV; Ebner-Priemer UW; Koch ED; Reif A; Ortega FB
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):5525. PubMed ID: 35365696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Variability in measuring physical activity in children with cerebral palsy.
Mitchell LE; Ziviani J; Boyd RN
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):194-200. PubMed ID: 24824775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Feasibility Study Comparing Physical Activity Classifications from Accelerometers with Wearable Camera Data.
Davies A; Allman-Farinelli M; Owen K; Signal L; Hosking C; Wang L; Bauman A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33322117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
Scott JJ; Rowlands AV; Cliff DP; Morgan PJ; Plotnikoff RC; Lubans DR
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28501418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors.
Hildebrand M; VAN Hees VT; Hansen BH; Ekelund U
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1816-24. PubMed ID: 24887173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing accelerometer, pedometer and a questionnaire for measuring physical activity in bronchiectasis: a validity and feasibility study?
O'Neill B; McDonough SM; Wilson JJ; Bradbury I; Hayes K; Kirk A; Kent L; Cosgrove D; Bradley JM; Tully MA
Respir Res; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28088206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measuring Children's Physical Activity: Compliance Using Skin-Taped Accelerometers.
Schneller MB; Bentsen P; Nielsen G; Brønd JC; Ried-Larsen M; Mygind E; Schipperijn J
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Jun; 49(6):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 28181981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cut points of the Actigraph GT9X for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity at four different wear locations.
Rhudy MB; Dreisbach SB; Moran MD; Ruggiero MJ; Veerabhadrappa P
J Sports Sci; 2020 Mar; 38(5):503-510. PubMed ID: 31865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing sedentary behavior with the GENEActiv: introducing the sedentary sphere.
Rowlands AV; Olds TS; Hillsdon M; Pulsford R; Hurst TL; Eston RG; Gomersall SR; Johnston K; Langford J
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Jun; 46(6):1235-47. PubMed ID: 24263980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Device Agnostic Approach to Predict Children's Activity from Consumer Wearable Accelerometer Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Weaver RG; White J; Finnegan O; Nelakuditi S; Zhu X; Burkart S; Beets M; Brown T; Pate R; Welk GJ; DE Zambotti M; Ghosal R; Wang Y; Armstrong B; Adams EL; Reesor-Oyer L; Pfledderer CD; Bastyr M; VON Klinggraeff L; Parker H
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Feb; 56(2):370-379. PubMed ID: 37707503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Biomechanical Re-Examination of Physical Activity Measurement with Accelerometers.
Fridolfsson J; Börjesson M; Arvidsson D
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30314272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study.
O'Neil ME; Fragala-Pinkham MA; Forman JL; Trost SG
J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2014; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 25260506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Beyond Cut Points: Accelerometer Metrics that Capture the Physical Activity Profile.
Rowlands AV; Edwardson CL; Davies MJ; Khunti K; Harrington DM; Yates T
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jun; 50(6):1323-1332. PubMed ID: 29360664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
