These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28977189)
1. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Souza AC; Alexandre NMC; Guirardello EB Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(3):649-659. PubMed ID: 28977189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments. Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. DeVon HA; Block ME; Moyle-Wright P; Ernst DM; Hayden SJ; Lazzara DJ; Savoy SM; Kostas-Polston E J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 17535316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses: A systematic review. Osmancevic S; Schoberer D; Lohrmann C; Großschädl F Int J Nurs Stud; 2021 Jan; 113():103789. PubMed ID: 33212330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of psychometric properties of needs assessment tools in cancer patients: A systematic literature review. Tian L; Cao X; Feng X PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210242. PubMed ID: 30620770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. German language questionnaires for assessing implementation constructs and outcomes of psychosocial and health-related interventions: a systematic review. Kien C; Schultes MT; Szelag M; Schoberberger R; Gartlehner G Implement Sci; 2018 Dec; 13(1):150. PubMed ID: 30541590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of the psychometric properties of breastfeeding assessment tools. Ho YJ; McGrath JM J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 39(4):386-400. PubMed ID: 20629926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease. Huang H; Grant JA; Miller BS; Mirza FM; Gagnier JJ Am J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2572-82. PubMed ID: 25622986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instruments evaluating the quality of the clinical learning environment in nursing education: A systematic review of psychometric properties. Mansutti I; Saiani L; Grassetti L; Palese A Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Mar; 68():60-72. PubMed ID: 28088008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable? Scholtes VA; Terwee CB; Poolman RW Injury; 2011 Mar; 42(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 21145544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. Vergauwen K; Huijnen IP; Kos D; Van de Velde D; van Eupen I; Meeus M Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(19):1706-16. PubMed ID: 25365699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of measurement properties of instruments assessing presenteeism. Ospina MB; Dennett L; Waye A; Jacobs P; Thompson AH Am J Manag Care; 2015 Feb; 21(2):e171-85. PubMed ID: 25880491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Frost MH; Reeve BB; Liepa AM; Stauffer JW; Hays RD; Value Health; 2007; 10 Suppl 2():S94-S105. PubMed ID: 17995479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Sitzia J Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Aug; 11(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 10501602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Instruments assessing attitudes toward or capability regarding self-management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of measurement properties. Eyles JP; Hunter DJ; Meneses SRF; Collins NJ; Dobson F; Lucas BR; Mills K Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2017 Aug; 25(8):1210-1222. PubMed ID: 28263899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Trojan Lifetime Champions Health Survey: development, validity, and reliability. Sorenson SC; Romano R; Scholefield RM; Schroeder ET; Azen SP; Salem GJ J Athl Train; 2015 Apr; 50(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 25611315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring health-related quality of life in cervical cancer patients: a systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity. Tax C; Steenbergen ME; Zusterzeel PL; Bekkers RL; Rovers MM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):15. PubMed ID: 28125962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity. Hamoen EH; De Rooij M; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM Urol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):69.e19-28. PubMed ID: 24433753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties? Teixeira AR; Bicalho D; Slater B; Lima TM PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0235182. PubMed ID: 34370729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review of psychometric testing of instruments that measure intention to work with older people. Che CC; Hairi NN; Chong MC J Adv Nurs; 2017 Sep; 73(9):2049-2064. PubMed ID: 28122163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]