579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28977189)
1. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.
Souza AC; Alexandre NMC; Guirardello EB
Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(3):649-659. PubMed ID: 28977189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.
DeVon HA; Block ME; Moyle-Wright P; Ernst DM; Hayden SJ; Lazzara DJ; Savoy SM; Kostas-Polston E
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 17535316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses: A systematic review.
Osmancevic S; Schoberer D; Lohrmann C; Großschädl F
Int J Nurs Stud; 2021 Jan; 113():103789. PubMed ID: 33212330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of psychometric properties of needs assessment tools in cancer patients: A systematic literature review.
Tian L; Cao X; Feng X
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210242. PubMed ID: 30620770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. German language questionnaires for assessing implementation constructs and outcomes of psychosocial and health-related interventions: a systematic review.
Kien C; Schultes MT; Szelag M; Schoberberger R; Gartlehner G
Implement Sci; 2018 Dec; 13(1):150. PubMed ID: 30541590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of the psychometric properties of breastfeeding assessment tools.
Ho YJ; McGrath JM
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 39(4):386-400. PubMed ID: 20629926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease.
Huang H; Grant JA; Miller BS; Mirza FM; Gagnier JJ
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2572-82. PubMed ID: 25622986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instruments evaluating the quality of the clinical learning environment in nursing education: A systematic review of psychometric properties.
Mansutti I; Saiani L; Grassetti L; Palese A
Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Mar; 68():60-72. PubMed ID: 28088008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable?
Scholtes VA; Terwee CB; Poolman RW
Injury; 2011 Mar; 42(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 21145544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review.
Vergauwen K; Huijnen IP; Kos D; Van de Velde D; van Eupen I; Meeus M
Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(19):1706-16. PubMed ID: 25365699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of measurement properties of instruments assessing presenteeism.
Ospina MB; Dennett L; Waye A; Jacobs P; Thompson AH
Am J Manag Care; 2015 Feb; 21(2):e171-85. PubMed ID: 25880491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures?
Frost MH; Reeve BB; Liepa AM; Stauffer JW; Hays RD;
Value Health; 2007; 10 Suppl 2():S94-S105. PubMed ID: 17995479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies.
Sitzia J
Int J Qual Health Care; 1999 Aug; 11(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 10501602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Instruments assessing attitudes toward or capability regarding self-management of osteoarthritis: a systematic review of measurement properties.
Eyles JP; Hunter DJ; Meneses SRF; Collins NJ; Dobson F; Lucas BR; Mills K
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2017 Aug; 25(8):1210-1222. PubMed ID: 28263899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quality of mental health literacy measurement tools evaluating the stigma of mental illness: a systematic review.
Wei Y; McGrath P; Hayden J; Kutcher S
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Oct; 27(5):433-462. PubMed ID: 28462747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Trojan Lifetime Champions Health Survey: development, validity, and reliability.
Sorenson SC; Romano R; Scholefield RM; Schroeder ET; Azen SP; Salem GJ
J Athl Train; 2015 Apr; 50(4):407-18. PubMed ID: 25611315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring health-related quality of life in cervical cancer patients: a systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity.
Tax C; Steenbergen ME; Zusterzeel PL; Bekkers RL; Rovers MM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):15. PubMed ID: 28125962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity.
Hamoen EH; De Rooij M; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM
Urol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):69.e19-28. PubMed ID: 24433753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
Teixeira AR; Bicalho D; Slater B; Lima TM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0235182. PubMed ID: 34370729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
