337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28978227)
1. Next-Generation Single-Use Ureteroscopes: An In Vitro Comparison.
Tom WR; Wollin DA; Jiang R; Radvak D; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1301-1306. PubMed ID: 28978227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vitro Evaluation of Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Practical Comparison for a Patient-Centered Approach.
Marchini GS; Batagello CA; Monga M; Torricelli FCM; Vicentini FC; Danilovic A; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):184-191. PubMed ID: 29239229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an
Dragos LB; Somani BK; Keller EX; De Coninck VMJ; Herrero MR; Kamphuis GM; Bres-Niewada E; Sener ET; Doizi S; Wiseman OJ; Traxer O
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Sep; 8(Suppl 4):S359-S370. PubMed ID: 31656742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of optics and performance of single channel and a novel dual-channel fiberoptic ureteroscope.
Lusch A; Okhunov Z; del Junco M; Yoon R; Khanipour R; Menhadji A; Landman J
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):268-72. PubMed ID: 25530400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchtop Assessment of a New Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Whelan P; Terry RS; Qi R; Ketterman B; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):755-760. PubMed ID: 33207957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Avoiding a Lemon: Performance Consistency of Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Winship B; Wollin D; Carlos E; Li J; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 30612445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which Flexible Ureteroscopes (Digital vs. Fiber-Optic) Can Easily Reach the Difficult Lower Pole Calices and Have Better End-Tip Deflection: In Vitro Study on K-Box. A PETRA Evaluation.
Dragos LB; Somani BK; Sener ET; Buttice S; Proietti S; Ploumidis A; Iacoboaie CT; Doizi S; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):630-637. PubMed ID: 28478744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro and in vivo comparison of optics and performance of a distal sensor ureteroscope versus a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope.
Lusch A; Abdelshehid C; Hidas G; Osann KE; Okhunov Z; McDougall E; Landman J
J Endourol; 2013 Jul; 27(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 23402369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the Ergonomics of Flexible Ureteroscopy.
Ludwig WW; Lee G; Ziemba JB; Ko JS; Matlaga BR
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1062-1066. PubMed ID: 28817961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The digital flexible ureteroscope: in vitro assessment of optical characteristics.
Zilberman DE; Lipkin ME; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Mancini JG; Raymundo ME; Zhong P; Preminger GM
J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):519-22. PubMed ID: 21361823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
