116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28978279)
41. Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory?
Lehman M; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1573-1591. PubMed ID: 26974674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Going beyond the spacing effect: Does it matter how time on a task is distributed?
Murphy DH; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 May; 76(5):1131-1154. PubMed ID: 35786148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Working memory capacity and the spacing effect in cued recall.
Delaney PF; Godbole NR; Holden LR; Chang Y
Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):784-797. PubMed ID: 29226769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments.
Coppens LC; Verkoeijen PP; Bouwmeester S; Rikers RM
BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):25. PubMed ID: 27240421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
Blumen HM; Rajaram S
Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Neural mechanisms of the spacing effect in episodic memory: A parallel EEG and fMRI study.
Zhao X; Wang C; Liu Q; Xiao X; Jiang T; Chen C; Xue G
Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():76-92. PubMed ID: 25989444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Grain size of recall practice for lengthy text material: fragile and mysterious effects on memory.
Wissman KT; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):439-55. PubMed ID: 25068860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Spacing of repetitions improves learning and memory after moderate and severe TBI.
Hillary FG; Schultheis MT; Challis BH; Millis SR; Carnevale GJ; Galshi T; DeLuca J
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12607171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The spacing effect in older and younger adults: does context matter?
Bercovitz KE; Bell MC; Simone PM; Wiseheart M
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2017 Nov; 24(6):703-716. PubMed ID: 27805865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Encoding richness of self-generated elaboration and spacing effects on incidental memory.
Toyota H; Kikuchi Y
Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):621-7. PubMed ID: 16383100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Failure of further learning: activities, structure, and meaning.
Fritz CO; Morris PE; Reid B; Aghdassi R; Naven CE
Br J Psychol; 2015 Feb; 106(1):22-45. PubMed ID: 24345182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Spaced training enhances equine learning performance.
Holcomb FR; Multhaup KS; Erwin SR; Daniels SE
Anim Cogn; 2022 Jun; 25(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 34860336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Inhibition and retrieval of facts in young and older adults.
Gómez-Ariza CJ; Pelegrina S; Lechuga MT; Suárez A; Bajo MT
Exp Aging Res; 2009; 35(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 19173103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Age differences in coupling of intraindividual variability in mnemonic strategies and practice-related associative recall improvements.
Hertzog C; Lövdén M; Lindenberger U; Schmiedek F
Psychol Aging; 2017 Sep; 32(6):557-571. PubMed ID: 28569529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Efficacy of spaced learning in adaptation of optokinetic response.
Pham NC; Kim YG; Kim SJ; Kim CH
Brain Behav; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e01944. PubMed ID: 33185985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty.
Maddox GB; Balota DA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):760-74. PubMed ID: 25616776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda NJ; Pashler H; Vul E; Wixted JT; Rohrer D
Psychol Bull; 2006 May; 132(3):354-80. PubMed ID: 16719566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
