These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28978279)

  • 61. Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Science; 2010 Oct; 330(6002):335. PubMed ID: 20947756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Learning the names of people: the role of image mediators.
    Groninger LD; Groninger DH; Stiens J
    Memory; 1995 Jun; 3(2):147-67. PubMed ID: 7796302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Neurogenesis and the spacing effect: learning over time enhances memory and the survival of new neurons.
    Sisti HM; Glass AL; Shors TJ
    Learn Mem; 2007 May; 14(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 17522028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 18578849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The crutch of context-dependency: Effects of contextual support and constancy on acquisition and retention.
    Smith SM; Handy JD
    Memory; 2016 Sep; 24(8):1134-41. PubMed ID: 26247606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effects of the time dimension and presentation on incidental memory.
    Toyota H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 19831090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Very similar spacing-effect patterns in very different learning/practice domains.
    Kornmeier J; Spitzer M; Sosic-Vasic Z
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90656. PubMed ID: 24609081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Distributed retrieval practice promotes superior recall of anatomy information.
    Dobson JL; Perez J; Linderholm T
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):339-347. PubMed ID: 27860396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Is testing a more effective learning strategy than note-taking?
    Rummer R; Schweppe J; Gerst K; Wagner S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 28933873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion?
    Vaughn KE; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):897-909. PubMed ID: 27027887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Differences in procedural knowledge after a "spaced" and a "massed" version of an intensive course in emergency medicine, investigating a very short spacing interval.
    Breckwoldt J; Ludwig JR; Plener J; Schröder T; Gruber H; Peters H
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27670782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
    Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Significance of autobiographical episodes and spacing effects in incidental memory.
    Toyota H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Oct; 117(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 24611245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Examining the benefits of combining two learning strategies on recall of functional information in persons with multiple sclerosis.
    Goverover Y; Basso M; Wood H; Chiaravalloti N; DeLuca J
    Mult Scler; 2011 Dec; 17(12):1488-97. PubMed ID: 21586486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Toward a unified account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks.
    Russo R; Mammarella N; Avons SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):819-29. PubMed ID: 12219792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Diminished but not forgotten: effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits.
    Simone PM; Bell MC; Cepeda NJ
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 Sep; 68(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 23103383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.