These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28978815)

  • 1. Performance of materials used for biological personal protective equipment against blood splash penetration.
    Shimasaki N; Shinohara K; Morikawa H
    Ind Health; 2017 Dec; 55(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 28978815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Multifaceted Evaluation on the Penetration Resistance of Protective Clothing Fabrics against Viral Liquid Drops without Pressure.
    Shimasaki N; Okaue A; Morimoto M; Uchida Y; Koshiba T; Tsunoda K; Arakawa S; Shinohara K
    Biocontrol Sci; 2020; 25(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 32173667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new penetration test method: protection efficiency of glove and clothing materials against diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI).
    Henriks-Eckerman ML; Mäkelä E
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Mar; 59(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 25324563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Highly Sensitive Assay Using Synthetic Blood Containing Test Microbes for Evaluation of the Penetration Resistance of Protective Clothing Material under Applied Pressure.
    Shimasaki N; Hara M; Kikuno R; Shinohara K
    Biocontrol Sci; 2016; 21(3):141-52. PubMed ID: 27667519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures to evaluate the efficiency of protective clothing worn by operators applying pesticide.
    Espanhol-Soares M; Nociti LA; Machado-Neto JG
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):1041-53. PubMed ID: 23813887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing Penetration of Epoxy Resin and Diamine Hardeners through Protective Glove and Clothing Materials.
    Henriks-Eckerman ML; Mäkelä EA; Suuronen K
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Oct; 59(8):1034-43. PubMed ID: 26130079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resistance of Type 5 chemical protective clothing against nanometric airborne particles: Behavior of seams and zipper.
    Vinches L; Hallé S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Dec; 14(12):939-946. PubMed ID: 28825871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    Schwerin MR; Gordon EA; Wood SC; Lucas AD
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2019; 53(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 31162954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isolation gowns in health care settings: Laboratory studies, regulations and standards, and potential barriers of gown selection and use.
    Kilinc Balci FS
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 Jan; 44(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 26391468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current global standards for chemical protective clothing: how to choose the right protection for the right job?
    VAN Wely E
    Ind Health; 2017 Dec; 55(6):485-499. PubMed ID: 29046493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personal protective equipment solution for UK military medical personnel working in an Ebola virus disease treatment unit in Sierra Leone.
    Reidy P; Fletcher T; Shieber C; Shallcross J; Towler H; Ping M; Kenworthy L; Silman N; Aarons E
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 May; 96(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 28420487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of chamber design requirements for testing of personal protective clothing ensembles.
    Gao P; King WP; Shaffer R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug; 4(8):562-71. PubMed ID: 17558802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal Protective Equipment in Animal Research.
    Villano JS; Follo JM; Chappell MG; Collins MT
    Comp Med; 2017 Jun; 67(3):203-214. PubMed ID: 28662749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sustainable Personal Protective Clothing for Healthcare Applications: A Review.
    Karim N; Afroj S; Lloyd K; Oaten LC; Andreeva DV; Carr C; Farmery AD; Kim ID; Novoselov KS
    ACS Nano; 2020 Oct; 14(10):12313-12340. PubMed ID: 32866368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydrostatic Penetration Testing of Protective Glove Materials Using Water and Synthetic Blood to Evaluate Hole Size and Screen Mesh Using an Automated Pressure Delivery System.
    Cohen-Gómez E; Ruz ML; Hoyas-Pablos EM; Vázquez F
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2023 Mar; 67(3):414-422. PubMed ID: 36610404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is secondary chemical exposure of hospital personnel of clinical importance?
    De Groot R; Van Zoelen GA; Leenders MEC; Van Riel AJHP; De Vries I; De Lange DW
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2021 Apr; 59(4):269-278. PubMed ID: 33448889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemical exposure reduction: Factors impacting on South African herbicide sprayers' personal protective equipment compliance and high risk work practices.
    Andrade-Rivas F; Rother HA
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():34-45. PubMed ID: 26093240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Personal Protective Standards: Caring for Patients With Ebola Virus.
    Franklin SM
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2016; 30(2):E1-8. PubMed ID: 26848906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance study of protective clothing against hot water splashes: from bench scale test to instrumented manikin test.
    Lu Y; Song G; Wang F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Mar; 59(2):232-42. PubMed ID: 25349371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of bioassay system for evaluation of materials for personal protective equipment (PPE) against toxic effects of ionizing radiations.
    Yamauchi M; Sakuma S
    Ind Health; 2017 Dec; 55(6):580-583. PubMed ID: 29021414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.