BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28979201)

  • 1. Do Neuroscience Journals Accept Replications? A Survey of Literature.
    Yeung AWK
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():468. PubMed ID: 28979201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial Practices.
    Martin GN; Clarke RM
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():523. PubMed ID: 28443044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
    Jones AW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark?
    Vasilevsky NA; Minnier J; Haendel MA; Champieux RE
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3208. PubMed ID: 28462024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Promoting transparency and reproducibility in Behavioral Neuroscience: Publishing replications, registered reports, and null results.
    Baxter MG; Burwell RD
    Behav Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 131(4):275-276. PubMed ID: 28714713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Requirements of health policy and services journals for authors to disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest: a cross-sectional study.
    Khamis AM; Hakoum MB; Bou-Karroum L; Habib JR; Ali A; Guyatt G; El-Jardali F; Akl EA
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Sep; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 28927424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls.
    Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Growth of Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Journals.
    Kortlever JTP; Tran TTH; Ring D; Menendez ME
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jul; 477(7):1727-1735. PubMed ID: 31135548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electronic submission of academic works: a survey of current editorial practices of radiologic journals.
    Jackson GW; Davidson HC; Wiggins RH; Harnsberger HR
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 11440253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003.
    Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. If At First You Don't Succeed: The Fate of Manuscripts Rejected by Academic Emergency Medicine.
    Grant WD; Cone DC
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Oct; 22(10):1213-7. PubMed ID: 26394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Changing Landscape of Neuroscience Research, 2006-2015: A Bibliometric Study.
    Yeung AW; Goto TK; Leung WK
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():120. PubMed ID: 28377687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.
    Beall J
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Feb; 98(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 26829665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.
    Shen C; Björk BC
    BMC Med; 2015 Oct; 13():230. PubMed ID: 26423063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alternative bibliometrics from the web of knowledge surpasses the impact factor in a 2-year ahead annual citation calculation: Linear mixed-design models' analysis of neuroscience journals.
    Diaz-Ruiz A; Orbe-Arteaga U; Rios C; Roldan-Valadez E
    Neurol India; 2018; 66(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 29322967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors.
    Meerpohl JJ; Wolff RF; Niemeyer CM; Antes G; von Elm E
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2010 Mar; 164(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 20194261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Getting published in Radiology: A Deputy Editor's perspective.
    Guermazi A; Kressel HY
    Jpn J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):678-85. PubMed ID: 26242773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.