455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28980050)
21. Characterization of benthic communities and physical habitat in the Stanislaus, Tuolumne, and Merced Rivers, California.
Hall LW; Killen WD; Anderson RD
Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Apr; 115(1-3):223-64. PubMed ID: 16648958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Baseline assessment of the hydrological network and land use in riparian buffers of Pampean streams of Uruguay.
Mary-Lauyé AL; González-Bergonzoni I; Gobel N; Somma A; Silva I; Lucas CM
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Nov; 195(1):80. PubMed ID: 36342548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Riparian buffer zones as pesticide filters of no-till crops.
Aguiar TR; Bortolozo FR; Hansel FA; Rasera K; Ferreira MT
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Jul; 22(14):10618-26. PubMed ID: 25744820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Agricultural impacts on streams near Nitrate Vulnerable Zones: A case study in the Ebro basin, Northern Spain.
Ladrera R; Belmar O; Tomás R; Prat N; Cañedo-Argüelles M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0218582. PubMed ID: 31703059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of local land-use on riparian vegetation, water quality, and the functional organization of macroinvertebrate assemblages.
Fierro P; Bertrán C; Tapia J; Hauenstein E; Peña-Cortés F; Vergara C; Cerna C; Vargas-Chacoff L
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():724-734. PubMed ID: 28763669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ecological Status of a Patagonian Mountain River: Usefulness of Environmental and Biotic Metrics for Rehabilitation Assessment.
Laura MM; Adriana MK; Cecilia B; La Ludmila M; Cecilia PY; Gabriela P; José B
Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 57(6):1166-87. PubMed ID: 26961305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stream buffer effectiveness in an agriculturally influenced area, southwestern Georgia: responses of water quality, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians.
Muenz TK; Golladay SW; Vellidis G; Smith LL
J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(5):1924-38. PubMed ID: 16973634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments.
Ducros CM; Joyce CB
Environ Manage; 2003 Aug; 32(2):252-67. PubMed ID: 14753650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mature and old-growth riparian forests: structure, dynamics, and effects on Adirondack stream habitats.
Keeton WS; Kraft CE; Warren DR
Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):852-68. PubMed ID: 17494402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Legal ecotones: A comparative analysis of riparian policy protection in the Oregon Coast Range, USA.
Boisjolie BA; Santelmann MV; Flitcroft RL; Duncan SL
J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():206-220. PubMed ID: 28388459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Importance of riparian forests in urban catchments contingent on sediment and hydrologic regimes.
Roy AH; Freeman MC; Freeman BJ; Wenger SJ; Ensign WE; Meyer JL
Environ Manage; 2006 Apr; 37(4):523-39. PubMed ID: 16465563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Riparian buffers: Disrupting the transport of E. coli from rural catchments to streams.
Lim TJY; Sargent R; Henry R; Fletcher TD; Coleman RA; McCarthy DT; Lintern A
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 222():118897. PubMed ID: 35932702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Catchment land use-dependent effects of barrage fishponds on the functioning of headwater streams.
Four B; Arce E; Danger M; Gaillard J; Thomas M; Banas D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Feb; 24(6):5452-5468. PubMed ID: 28028701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The reduction effects of riparian reforestation on runoff and nutrient export based on AnnAGNPS model in a small typical watershed, China.
Jiang K; Li Z; Luo C; Wu M; Chao L; Zhou Q; Zhao H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(6):5934-5943. PubMed ID: 30613883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors affecting the effectiveness of riparian buffers in retaining sediment: an isotopic approach.
Cordeiro GG; Vasconcelos V; Salemi LF; Nardoto GB
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Oct; 192(11):735. PubMed ID: 33123773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the ecological status of small Mediterranean rivers using benthic macroinvertebrates and macrophytes as indicators.
Rodrigues C; Alves P; Bio A; Vieira C; Guimarães L; Pinheiro C; Vieira N
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Aug; 191(9):596. PubMed ID: 31463760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Organic matter breakdown in streams in a region of contrasting anthropogenic land use.
Voß K; Fernández D; Schäfer RB
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 527-528():179-84. PubMed ID: 25958365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA.
Nerbonne BA; Vondracek B
Environ Manage; 2001 Jul; 28(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 11437003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of connectivity in forest patches, and riparian vegetation width on stream macroinvertebrate fauna.
Valle IC; Buss DF; Baptista DF
Braz J Biol; 2013 May; 73(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23917549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Understanding stream bank erosion and deposition in Iowa, USA: A seven year study along streams in different regions with different riparian land-uses.
Zaimes GΝ; Tamparopoulos AE; Tufekcioglu M; Schultz RC
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 287():112352. PubMed ID: 33743416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
