These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28980191)

  • 1. Surprising depth cue captures attention in visual search.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 28980191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does attention spread across objects oriented in depth?
    Reppa I; Fougnie D; Schmidt WC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):912-25. PubMed ID: 20436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.
    Zhou B
    Cogn Process; 2008 Aug; 9(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 18327623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of relevant and irrelevant stereoscopic depth cues: Depth information does not always capture attention.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 30030691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for attentional capture by a surprising color singleton in visual search.
    Horstmann G
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 12430832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal task-sets override attentional capture by rare cues.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):681-692. PubMed ID: 29154636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 25520044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adding depth to overlapping displays can improve visual search performance.
    Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Liversedge SP; Cave KR; Holliman NS; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1532-1549. PubMed ID: 28383964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Depth modulation of the attentional repulsion effect.
    Chien SE; Watanabe K
    Perception; 2013; 42(12):1333-43. PubMed ID: 24649635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the retinal size of a peripheral cue on attentional orienting in two- and three-dimensional worlds.
    Jiang Y; Li S; Li Y; Zeng H; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1285-92. PubMed ID: 27007477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments.
    Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1574-84. PubMed ID: 25832193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal enhancement, not active suppression, follows the contingent capture of visual attention.
    Livingstone AC; Christie GJ; Wright RD; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 28134549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereoscopic Slant Contrast and the Perception of Inducer Slant at Brief Stimulus Presentations.
    Harada S; Mitsudo H
    Perception; 2018 Feb; 47(2):171-184. PubMed ID: 29117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.