These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28980277)

  • 1. Straightforward Protocol for Gel-Free Proteomic Analysis of Adipose Tissue.
    Pasing Y; Schniers A; Hansen T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1788():289-296. PubMed ID: 28980277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Plasma proteome coverage is increased by unique peptide recovery from sodium deoxycholate precipitate.
    Serra A; Zhu H; Gallart-Palau X; Park JE; Ho HH; Tam JP; Sze SK
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Mar; 408(7):1963-73. PubMed ID: 26804737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proteomics of hydrophobic samples: Fast, robust and low-cost workflows for clinical approaches.
    Pasing Y; Colnoe S; Hansen T
    Proteomics; 2017 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 27412720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample Preparation by Easy Extraction and Digestion (SPEED) - A Universal, Rapid, and Detergent-free Protocol for Proteomics Based on Acid Extraction.
    Doellinger J; Schneider A; Hoeller M; Lasch P
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 19(1):209-222. PubMed ID: 31754045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lys-C/Trypsin Tandem-Digestion Protocol for Gel-Free Proteomic Analysis of Colon Biopsies.
    Schniers A; Pasing Y; Hansen T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1959():113-122. PubMed ID: 30852818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
    Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
    Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sodium laurate, a novel protease- and mass spectrometry-compatible detergent for mass spectrometry-based membrane proteomics.
    Lin Y; Huo L; Liu Z; Li J; Liu Y; He Q; Wang X; Liang S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59779. PubMed ID: 23555778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement of a sample preparation method assisted by sodium deoxycholate for mass-spectrometry-based shotgun membrane proteomics.
    Lin Y; Lin H; Liu Z; Wang K; Yan Y
    J Sep Sci; 2014 Nov; 37(22):3321-9. PubMed ID: 25196059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shotgun analysis of membrane proteomes by an improved SDS-assisted sample preparation method coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
    Lin Y; Jiang H; Yan Y; Peng B; Chen J; Lin H; Liu Z
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2012 Dec; 911():6-14. PubMed ID: 23217299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative assessment of in-solution digestion efficiency identifies optimal protocols for unbiased protein analysis.
    León IR; Schwämmle V; Jensen ON; Sprenger RR
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Oct; 12(10):2992-3005. PubMed ID: 23792921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of N-linked Glycans Derived from Glycoproteins Using Sodium Deoxycholate Detergent.
    Zhu R; Zhou S; Peng W; Huang Y; Mirzaei P; Donohoo K; Mechref Y
    J Proteome Res; 2018 Aug; 17(8):2668-2678. PubMed ID: 29745666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP).
    Lipecka J; Chhuon C; Bourderioux M; Bessard MA; van Endert P; Edelman A; Guerrera IC
    Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 16(13):1852-7. PubMed ID: 27219663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation for proteomics experiments.
    Hughes CS; Moggridge S; Müller T; Sorensen PH; Morin GB; Krijgsveld J
    Nat Protoc; 2019 Jan; 14(1):68-85. PubMed ID: 30464214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cloud-point extraction and delipidation of porcine brain proteins in combination with bottom-up mass spectrometry approaches for proteome analysis.
    Shevchenko G; Sjödin MO; Malmström D; Wetterhall M; Bergquist J
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Aug; 9(8):3903-11. PubMed ID: 20586484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the combinative application of SDS and sodium deoxycholate to the LC-MS-based shotgun analysis of membrane proteomes.
    Lin Y; Wang K; Yan Y; Lin H; Peng B; Liu Z
    J Sep Sci; 2013 Sep; 36(18):3026-34. PubMed ID: 23832743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proteome analysis of tissues by mass spectrometry.
    Dapic I; Baljeu-Neuman L; Uwugiaren N; Kers J; Goodlett DR; Corthals GL
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2019 Aug; 38(4-5):403-441. PubMed ID: 31390493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample preparation method.
    Wiśniewski JR; Zielinska DF; Mann M
    Anal Biochem; 2011 Mar; 410(2):307-9. PubMed ID: 21144814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suspension Trapping (S-Trap) Is Compatible with Typical Protein Extraction Buffers and Detergents for Bottom-Up Proteomics.
    Elinger D; Gabashvili A; Levin Y
    J Proteome Res; 2019 Mar; 18(3):1441-1445. PubMed ID: 30761899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimizing technical variation during sample preparation prior to label-free quantitative mass spectrometry.
    Scheerlinck E; Dhaenens M; Van Soom A; Peelman L; De Sutter P; Van Steendam K; Deforce D
    Anal Biochem; 2015 Dec; 490():14-9. PubMed ID: 26302362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics; from Proteomes to Peptides.
    Rogers JC; Bomgarden RD
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():43-62. PubMed ID: 27975212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.