1049 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28980386)
1. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention results in reduced ischemic myocardium and improved outcomes.
Sawant AC; Bhardwaj A; Banerjee K; Jobanputra Y; Kumar A; Parikh P; Kandregula KC; Poddar K; Ellis SG; Nair R; Corbelli J; Kapadia S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):692-700. PubMed ID: 29405553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with small-vessel disease.
Puymirat E; Peace A; Mangiacapra F; Conte M; Ntarladimas Y; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wijns W; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 5(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 22319067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Zimmermann FM; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Desai M; Oldroyd KG; Park SJ; Reardon MJ; Wendler O; Woo J; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):619-626.e2. PubMed ID: 26386784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Andersen BK; Ding D; Mogensen LJH; Tu S; Holm NR; Westra J; Wijns W
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2023 Feb; 9(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 36026514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.
Fournier S; Toth GG; De Bruyne B; Johnson NP; Ciccarelli G; Xaplanteris P; Milkas A; Strisciuglio T; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Casselman F; Van Praet F; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Barbato E
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e006368. PubMed ID: 29848611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-Year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions.
Aurigemma C; Ding D; Tu S; Li C; Yu W; Li Y; Leone AM; Romagnoli E; Vergallo R; Maino A; Trani C; Wijns W; Burzotta F
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 May; 17(5):e013191. PubMed ID: 38660794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
van Nunen LX; Zimmermann FM; Tonino PA; Barbato E; Baumbach A; Engstrøm T; Klauss V; MacCarthy PA; Manoharan G; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; Van't Veer M; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH;
Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10006):1853-60. PubMed ID: 26333474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing treatment outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiu J; Chen G; Zheng H; Wang Y; Chen H; Liu X; Wu J; Bin J
Clin Invest Med; 2016 Feb; 39(1):E25-36. PubMed ID: 26833170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation).
Fearon WF; Nishi T; De Bruyne B; Boothroyd DB; Barbato E; Tonino P; Jüni P; Pijls NHJ; Hlatky MA;
Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 29097450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients With Multivessel Disease.
Di Gioia G; Soto Flores N; Franco D; Colaiori I; Sonck J; Gigante C; Kodeboina M; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Van Praet F; Casselman F; Degriek I; Stockman B; Barbato E; Collet C; De Bruyne B
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 13(10):e009157. PubMed ID: 33040579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve- versus angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts.
Di Serafino L; De Bruyne B; Mangiacapra F; Bartunek J; Agostoni P; Vanderheyden M; Scognamiglio G; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; Barbato E
Am Heart J; 2013 Jul; 166(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23816029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Prospective Natural History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis Using Fractional Flow Reserve.
Barbato E; Toth GG; Johnson NP; Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Curzen N; Piroth Z; Rioufol G; Jüni P; De Bruyne B
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 68(21):2247-2255. PubMed ID: 27884241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Revascularization on Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow as Assessed by Serial [
Driessen RS; Danad I; Stuijfzand WJ; Schumacher SP; Knuuti J; Mäki M; Lammertsma AA; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Raijmakers PG; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 11(5):e007417. PubMed ID: 29703779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental Prognostic Value of Post-Intervention Pd/Pa in Patients Undergoing Ischemia-Driven Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Hakeem A; Ghosh B; Shah K; Agarwal S; Kasula S; Hacioglu Y; Bhatti S; Ahmed Z; Uretsky B
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2002-2014. PubMed ID: 31648762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided strategy in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a randomized trial.
Lee JM; Kim HK; Park KH; Choo EH; Kim CJ; Lee SH; Kim MC; Hong YJ; Ahn SG; Doh JH; Lee SY; Park SD; Lee HJ; Kang MG; Koh JS; Cho YK; Nam CW; Koo BK; Lee BK; Yun KH; Hong D; Joh HS; Choi KH; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Hahn JY;
Eur Heart J; 2023 Feb; 44(6):473-484. PubMed ID: 36540034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
