BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28981356)

  • 1. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
    Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
    Matsuoka Y; Ishioka J; Tanaka H; Kimura T; Yoshida S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kihara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W76-W84. PubMed ID: 28570124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Upgraded Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 3 Peripheral Zone Observations Stratified by a Size Threshold of 15 mm.
    Abreu-Gomez J; Krishna S; Narayanasamy S; Flood TA; McInnes MDF; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Oct; 213(4):836-843. PubMed ID: 31120786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.
    Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Thornhill RE; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 28267359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
    Seo JW; Shin SJ; Taik Oh Y; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W1-W9. PubMed ID: 28418690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.
    Gaur S; Harmon S; Rosenblum L; Greer MD; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W33-W41. PubMed ID: 29733695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
    Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive role of PI-RADSv2 and ADC parameters in differentiating Gleason pattern 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Alessandrino F; Taghipour M; Hassanzadeh E; Ziaei A; Vangel M; Fedorov A; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jan; 44(1):279-285. PubMed ID: 30066169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate.
    Purysko AS; Bittencourt LK; Bullen JA; Mostardeiro TR; Herts BR; Klein EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 28570099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study.
    Choi MH; Kim CK; Lee YJ; Jung SE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):839-846. PubMed ID: 30779662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
    Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.
    Smith CP; Harmon SA; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Law YM; Shebel H; An JY; Czarniecki M; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(6):1694-1703. PubMed ID: 30575184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging has limited added value over T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging when using PI-RADSv2 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA.
    De Visschere P; Lumen N; Ost P; Decaestecker K; Pattyn E; Villeirs G
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jan; 72(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 27726850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PI-RADS version 2: Preoperative role in the detection of normal-sized pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
    Park SY; Shin SJ; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Oh YT
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():22-28. PubMed ID: 28629566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference.
    Vargas HA; Hötker AM; Goldman DA; Moskowitz CS; Gondo T; Matsumoto K; Ehdaie B; Woo S; Fine SW; Reuter VE; Sala E; Hricak H
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 26396111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
    Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance and reproducibility of T2w based and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) based PI-RADSv2 lexicon descriptors for prostate MRI.
    Benndorf M; Hahn F; Krönig M; Jilg CA; Krauss T; Langer M; Dovi-Akué P
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():9-15. PubMed ID: 28668436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-analysis.
    Woo S; Suh CH; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
    Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 28196723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of PI-RADSv2 and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting confirmatory prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Nougaret S; Robertson N; Golia Pernicka J; Molinari N; Hötker AM; Ehdaie B; Sala E; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 28258355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transition zone prostate cancer: revisiting the role of multiparametric MRI at 3 T.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Kim S; Campbell N; Gaing B; Deng FM; Taneja SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):W266-72. PubMed ID: 25714311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.