137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28981422)
1. Phenotype Prediction from Metagenomic Data Using Clustering and Assembly with Multiple Instance Learning (CAMIL).
Rahman MA; LaPierre N; Rangwala H
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(3):828-840. PubMed ID: 28981422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metagenome sequence clustering with hash-based canopies.
Rahman MA; LaPierre N; Rangwala H; Barbara D
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(6):1740006. PubMed ID: 29113561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. IDMIL: an alignment-free Interpretable Deep Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) for predicting disease from whole-metagenomic data.
Rahman MA; Rangwala H
Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i39-i47. PubMed ID: 32657370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binning Metagenomic Contigs Using Unsupervised Clustering and Reference Databases.
Jiang Z; Li X; Guo L
Interdiscip Sci; 2022 Dec; 14(4):795-803. PubMed ID: 35639335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A scalable assembly-free variable selection algorithm for biomarker discovery from metagenomes.
Gkanogiannis A; Gazut S; Salanoubat M; Kanj S; Brüls T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):311. PubMed ID: 27542753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unsupervised Binning of Metagenomic Assembled Contigs Using Improved Fuzzy C-Means Method.
Liu Y; Hou T; Kang B; Liu F
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017; 14(6):1459-1467. PubMed ID: 27295684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Locality-Sensitive Hashing-Based k-Mer Clustering for Identification of Differential Microbial Markers Related to Host Phenotype.
Han W; Tang H; Ye Y
J Comput Biol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):738-751. PubMed ID: 35584271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MetaCAA: A clustering-aided methodology for efficient assembly of metagenomic datasets.
Reddy RM; Mohammed MH; Mande SS
Genomics; 2014; 103(2-3):161-8. PubMed ID: 24607570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MetaCRS: unsupervised clustering of contigs with the recursive strategy of reducing metagenomic dataset's complexity.
Jiang Z; Li X; Guo L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 22(Suppl 12):315. PubMed ID: 35045830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating metagenomics tools for genome binning with real metagenomic datasets and CAMI datasets.
Yue Y; Huang H; Qi Z; Dou HM; Liu XY; Han TF; Chen Y; Song XJ; Zhang YH; Tu J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):334. PubMed ID: 32723290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 16S rRNA metagenome clustering and diversity estimation using locality sensitive hashing.
Rasheed Z; Rangwala H; Barbará D
BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S11. PubMed ID: 24565031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large-scale metagenomic sequence clustering on map-reduce clusters.
Yang X; Zola J; Aluru S
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Feb; 11(1):1340001. PubMed ID: 23427983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MetaDecoder: a novel method for clustering metagenomic contigs.
Liu CC; Dong SS; Chen JB; Wang C; Ning P; Guo Y; Yang TL
Microbiome; 2022 Mar; 10(1):46. PubMed ID: 35272700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Massive metagenomic data analysis using abundance-based machine learning.
Harris ZN; Dhungel E; Mosior M; Ahn TH
Biol Direct; 2019 Aug; 14(1):12. PubMed ID: 31370905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alignment-free supervised classification of metagenomes by recursive SVM.
Cui H; Zhang X
BMC Genomics; 2013 Sep; 14():641. PubMed ID: 24053649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MTR: taxonomic annotation of short metagenomic reads using clustering at multiple taxonomic ranks.
Gori F; Folino G; Jetten MS; Marchiori E
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 27(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 21127032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A New Unsupervised Binning Approach for Metagenomic Sequences Based on N-grams and Automatic Feature Weighting.
Liao R; Zhang R; Guan J; Zhou S
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2014; 11(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 26355506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the composition of species in metagenomes by clustering of next-generation read sequences.
Seok HS; Hong W; Kim J
Methods; 2014 Oct; 69(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 25072168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis and comparison of very large metagenomes with fast clustering and functional annotation.
Li W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 10():359. PubMed ID: 19863816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
