These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28981799)

  • 1. Brain indices of disagreement with one's social values predict EU referendum voting behavior.
    Galli G; Sirota M; Materassi M; Zaninotto F; Terry P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 12(11):1758-1765. PubMed ID: 28981799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The N400 effect captures nuances in implicit political preferences.
    Mahieux E; de-Wit L; Otten LJ; Devlin JT; Wicha NYY
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16730. PubMed ID: 39030391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
    Raccuia L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To Brexit or not to Brexit: The roles of Islamophobia, conspiracist beliefs, and integrated threat in voting intentions for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum.
    Swami V; Barron D; Weis L; Furnham A
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Feb; 109(1):156-179. PubMed ID: 28632335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?
    Friese M; Smith CT; Plischke T; Bluemke M; Nosek BA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44130. PubMed ID: 22952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.
    Lundberg KB; Payne BK
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85680. PubMed ID: 24489666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies.
    Moreno EM; Casado P; Martín-Loeches M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 27007770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early EEG responses to pre-electoral survey items reflect political attitudes and predict voting behavior.
    Galli G; Angelucci D; Bode S; De Giorgi C; De Sio L; Paparo A; Di Lorenzo G; Betti V
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18692. PubMed ID: 34548511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social proof in the human brain: Electrophysiological signatures of agreement and disagreement with the majority.
    Schnuerch R; Gibbons H
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Oct; 52(10):1328-42. PubMed ID: 26087659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explaining voting in the UK's 2016 EU referendum: Values, attitudes to immigration, European identity and political trust.
    Dennison J; Davidov E; Seddig D
    Soc Sci Res; 2020 Nov; 92():102476. PubMed ID: 33172565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Government instability shifts skin tone representations of and intentions to vote for political candidates.
    Stern C; Balcetis E; Cole S; West TV; Caruso EM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jan; 110(1):76-95. PubMed ID: 26727665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortisol and politics: variance in voting behavior is predicted by baseline cortisol levels.
    French JA; Smith KB; Alford JR; Guck A; Birnie AK; Hibbing JR
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Jun; 133():61-7. PubMed ID: 24835544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between cigarette smoking status and voting intentions: Cross sectional surveys in England 2015-2020.
    Cox S; Brown J; McQuire C; de Vocht F; Beard E; West R; Shahab L
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):2254. PubMed ID: 34895194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sociocultural approach to voting: Construing voting as a duty to others predicts political interest and engagement.
    Waldfogel HB; Dittmann AG; Birnbaum HJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(22):e2215051121. PubMed ID: 38768346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack.
    Hewig J; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 18761133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mobilizing IDEAS in the Scottish Referendum: Predicting voting intention and well-being with the Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective well-being model.
    Abrams D; Travaglino GA; Grant PR; Templeton A; Bennett M; Lalot F
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Apr; 59(2):425-446. PubMed ID: 31746019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: a behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework.
    Regenwetter M; Ho MH; Tsetlin I
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Oct; 114(4):994-1014. PubMed ID: 17907870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immigration, political trust, and Brexit - Testing an aversion amplification hypothesis.
    Abrams D; Travaglino GA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):310-326. PubMed ID: 29318624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.