467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28982212)
1. Differences in osmotic adjustment, foliar abscisic acid dynamics, and stomatal regulation between an isohydric and anisohydric woody angiosperm during drought.
Nolan RH; Tarin T; Santini NS; McAdam SAM; Ruman R; Eamus D
Plant Cell Environ; 2017 Dec; 40(12):3122-3134. PubMed ID: 28982212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethylene, not ABA, is closely linked to the recovery of gas exchange after drought in four Caragana species.
Yao GQ; Li FP; Nie ZF; Bi MH; Jiang H; Liu XD; Wei Y; Fang XW
Plant Cell Environ; 2021 Feb; 44(2):399-411. PubMed ID: 33131059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the turgor loss point characterize drought response in dryland plants?
Farrell C; Szota C; Arndt SK
Plant Cell Environ; 2017 Aug; 40(8):1500-1511. PubMed ID: 28342210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation.
Garcia-Forner N; Adams HD; Sevanto S; Collins AD; Dickman LT; Hudson PJ; Zeppel MJ; Jenkins MW; Powers H; Martínez-Vilalta J; Mcdowell NG
Plant Cell Environ; 2016 Jan; 39(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 26081870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coordinated variation in stem and leaf functional traits of temperate broadleaf tree species in the isohydric-anisohydric spectrum.
Chen Z; Zhang Y; Yuan W; Zhu S; Pan R; Wan X; Liu S
Tree Physiol; 2021 Sep; 41(9):1601-1610. PubMed ID: 33693879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abscisic acid mediates a divergence in the drought response of two conifers.
Brodribb TJ; McAdam SA
Plant Physiol; 2013 Jul; 162(3):1370-7. PubMed ID: 23709665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Most stomatal closure in woody species under moderate drought can be explained by stomatal responses to leaf turgor.
Rodriguez-Dominguez CM; Buckley TN; Egea G; de Cires A; Hernandez-Santana V; Martorell S; Diaz-Espejo A
Plant Cell Environ; 2016 Sep; 39(9):2014-26. PubMed ID: 27255698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stomatal responses in grapevine become increasingly more tolerant to low water potentials throughout the growing season.
Herrera JC; Calderan A; Gambetta GA; Peterlunger E; Forneck A; Sivilotti P; Cochard H; Hochberg U
Plant J; 2022 Feb; 109(4):804-815. PubMed ID: 34797611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isohydric species are not necessarily more carbon limited than anisohydric species during drought.
Garcia-Forner N; Biel C; Savé R; Martínez-Vilalta J
Tree Physiol; 2017 Apr; 37(4):441-455. PubMed ID: 27885172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isohydric and anisohydric strategies of wheat genotypes under osmotic stress: biosynthesis and function of ABA in stress responses.
Gallé Á; Csiszár J; Benyó D; Laskay G; Leviczky T; Erdei L; Tari I
J Plant Physiol; 2013 Nov; 170(16):1389-99. PubMed ID: 23702247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid.
Rogiers SY; Greer DH; Hatfield JM; Hutton RJ; Clarke SJ; Hutchinson PA; Somers A
Tree Physiol; 2012 Mar; 32(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 22199014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drought limitations to leaf-level gas exchange: results from a model linking stomatal optimization and cohesion-tension theory.
Novick KA; Miniat CF; Vose JM
Plant Cell Environ; 2016 Mar; 39(3):583-96. PubMed ID: 26466749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hormonal dynamics contributes to divergence in seasonal stomatal behaviour in a monsoonal plant community.
McAdam SA; Brodribb TJ
Plant Cell Environ; 2015 Mar; 38(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 24995884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationships between stomatal behavior, xylem vulnerability to cavitation and leaf water relations in two cultivars of Vitis vinifera.
Tombesi S; Nardini A; Farinelli D; Palliotti A
Physiol Plant; 2014 Nov; 152(3):453-64. PubMed ID: 24597791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Water potential regulation, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic transport under drought: deconstructing the iso/anisohydric concept.
Martínez-Vilalta J; Garcia-Forner N
Plant Cell Environ; 2017 Jun; 40(6):962-976. PubMed ID: 27739594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How does leaf succulence relate to plant drought resistance in woody shrubs?
Guo B; Arndt SK; Miller RE; Szota C; Farrell C
Tree Physiol; 2023 Sep; 43(9):1501-1513. PubMed ID: 37208014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamics of stem water uptake among isohydric and anisohydric species experiencing a severe drought.
Yi K; Dragoni D; Phillips RP; Roman DT; Novick KA
Tree Physiol; 2017 Oct; 37(10):1379-1392. PubMed ID: 28062727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stomatal kinetics and photosynthetic gas exchange along a continuum of isohydric to anisohydric regulation of plant water status.
Meinzer FC; Smith DD; Woodruff DR; Marias DE; McCulloh KA; Howard AR; Magedman AL
Plant Cell Environ; 2017 Aug; 40(8):1618-1628. PubMed ID: 28426140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Drought response strategies and hydraulic traits contribute to mechanistic understanding of plant dry-down to hydraulic failure.
Blackman CJ; Creek D; Maier C; Aspinwall MJ; Drake JE; Pfautsch S; O'Grady A; Delzon S; Medlyn BE; Tissue DT; Choat B
Tree Physiol; 2019 Jun; 39(6):910-924. PubMed ID: 30865274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aridity-dependent sequence of water potentials for stomatal closure and hydraulic dysfunctions in woody plants.
Jin Y; Hao G; Hammond WM; Yu K; Liu X; Ye Q; Zhou Z; Wang C
Glob Chang Biol; 2023 Apr; 29(7):2030-2040. PubMed ID: 36655297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
