BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28982263)

  • 1. A simulation study of outcome adaptive randomization in multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wathen JK; Thall PF
    Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):432-440. PubMed ID: 28982263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical controversies in clinical research: scientific and ethical problems with adaptive randomization in comparative clinical trials.
    Thall P; Fox P; Wathen J
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1621-8. PubMed ID: 25979922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative models and randomization techniques for Bayesian response-adaptive randomization with binary outcomes.
    Proper J; Connett J; Murray T
    Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 18(4):417-426. PubMed ID: 33926267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of multi-arm multi-stage design and adaptive randomization in platform clinical trials.
    Lin J; Bunn V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Mar; 54():48-59. PubMed ID: 28089763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Bayesian adaptive randomization and multi-stage designs for multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wason JM; Trippa L
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2206-21. PubMed ID: 24421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing statistical and ethical considerations in planning clinical trials: recommendations for response-adaptive randomization urn designs.
    Piccorelli AV; Fraker SA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1105-1118. PubMed ID: 29442610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian sequential design with adaptive randomization for 2-sided hypothesis test.
    Yu Q; Zhu L; Zhu H
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Nov; 16(6):451-465. PubMed ID: 28980435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.
    Jacob L; Uvarova M; Boulet S; Begaj I; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():67. PubMed ID: 27250349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of number of subjects required for comparison of drug versus control in adaptive designs.
    Hu FF; Hu JH
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Sep; 29(5):565-9. PubMed ID: 11126689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing three regularization methods to avoid extreme allocation probability in response-adaptive randomization.
    Du Y; Cook JD; Lee JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):309-319. PubMed ID: 28323532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment selection in multi-arm multi-stage designs: With application to a postpartum haemorrhage trial.
    Choodari-Oskooei B; Thwin SS; Blenkinsop A; Widmer M; Althabe F; Parmar MK
    Clin Trials; 2023 Feb; 20(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 36647713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adding experimental arms to platform clinical trials: randomization procedures and interim analyses.
    Ventz S; Cellamare M; Parmigiani G; Trippa L
    Biostatistics; 2018 Apr; 19(2):199-215. PubMed ID: 29036330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An overview of methodological considerations regarding adaptive stopping, arm dropping, and randomization in clinical trials.
    Granholm A; Kaas-Hansen BS; Lange T; Schjørring OL; Andersen LW; Perner A; Jensen AKG; Møller MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 153():45-54. PubMed ID: 36400262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation study for evaluating the performance of response-adaptive randomization.
    Du Y; Wang X; Jack Lee J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Jan; 40():15-25. PubMed ID: 25460340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian response-adaptive trial in tuberculosis: The endTB trial.
    Cellamare M; Ventz S; Baudin E; Mitnick CD; Trippa L
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 27559021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Bayesian adaptive randomization procedures with adaptive clip methods for multi-arm trials.
    May Lee K; Lee JJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1273-1287. PubMed ID: 33689524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian adaptive designs for multi-arm trials: an orthopaedic case study.
    Ryan EG; Lamb SE; Williamson E; Gates S
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 31937341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian predictive sample size selection design for single-arm exploratory clinical trials.
    Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4243-54. PubMed ID: 22807115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of methods for control allocation in multiple arm studies using response adaptive randomization.
    Viele K; Broglio K; McGlothlin A; Saville BR
    Clin Trials; 2020 Feb; 17(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 31630567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.