821 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28984050)
1. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28454568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double propensity-score adjustment: A solution to design bias or bias due to incomplete matching.
Austin PC
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):201-222. PubMed ID: 25038071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score.
Austin PC; Stuart EA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2505-2525. PubMed ID: 26329750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
Austin PC; Stuart EA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score.
Austin PC
Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 172(9):1092-7. PubMed ID: 20802241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):1057-69. PubMed ID: 24123228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of average treatment effect based on a multi-index propensity score.
Xu J; Wei K; Wang C; Huang C; Xue Y; Zhang R; Qin G; Yu Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):337. PubMed ID: 36577950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study.
Weymann D; Chan B; Regier DA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 37559105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A Monte-Carlo study for propensity score methods].
Wang T; Yamaguchi T; Ohashi Y; Feng XS; Jiang QW
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 26(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 16185467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cholesterol-lowering effect of statin therapy in a clinical HIV cohort: an application of double propensity score adjustment.
Levy ME; Ma Y; Magnus M; Younes N; Castel AD;
Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 44():8-15. PubMed ID: 32204991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiply robust estimator for the difference in survival functions using pseudo-observations.
Wang C; Wei K; Huang C; Yu Y; Qin G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):247. PubMed ID: 37872495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On regression adjustment for the propensity score.
Vansteelandt S; Daniel RM
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4053-72. PubMed ID: 24825821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.
Antonelli J; Cefalu M; Palmer N; Agniel D
Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 29750844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.
Austin PC
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 20925139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Model averaged double robust estimation.
Cefalu M; Dominici F; Arvold N; Parmigiani G
Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):410-421. PubMed ID: 27893927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
