246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28986719)
1. 2D vs. 3D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-results of a prospective randomized trial.
Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Dec; 402(8):1241-1253. PubMed ID: 28986719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cognitive load in 3d and 2d minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
Inama M; Spolverato G; Impellizzeri H; Bacchion M; Creciun M; Casaril A; Moretto G
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jul; 34(7):3262-3269. PubMed ID: 32239306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Performed by junior SUrgeonS: impact of 3D visualization on surgical outcome. Randomized multicentre clinical trial. (LAPSUS TRIAL).
Botteri E; Ortenzi M; Alemanno G; Giordano A; Travaglio E; Turolo C; Castiglioni S; Treppiedi E; Rosso E; Gattolin A; Caracino V; Prosperi P; Valeri A; Guerrieri M; Vettoretto N
Surg Endosc; 2021 Feb; 35(2):710-717. PubMed ID: 32060747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of 3D vision on mental workload and laparoscopic performance in inexperienced subjects.
Gómez-Gómez E; Carrasco-Valiente J; Valero-Rosa J; Campos-Hernández JP; Anglada-Curado FJ; Carazo-Carazo JL; Font-Ugalde P; Requena-Tapia MJ
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 25457567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D vs. 2D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-an advantage? Results of standardised black box training in laparoscopic surgery.
Buia A; Stockhausen F; Filmann N; Hanisch E
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Feb; 402(1):167-171. PubMed ID: 27761712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled trial of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging system on duration of surgery and mental workload for laparoscopic gastropexies in dogs.
Balsa IM; Giuffrida MA; Mayhew PD
Vet Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(5):944-953. PubMed ID: 33864647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy?
Özsoy M; Kallidonis P; Kyriazis I; Panagopoulos V; Vasilas M; Sakellaropoulos GC; Liatsikos E
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 May; 30(4):1325-33. PubMed ID: 25772250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.
Spille J; Wenners A; von Hehn U; Maass N; Pecks U; Mettler L; Alkatout I
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(5):867-877. PubMed ID: 28215494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2D 4K vs. 3D HD laparoscopic imaging systems in bariatric surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled prospective trial.
Zwimpfer TA; Stiegeler N; Müller PC; Schötzau A; Fellmann-Fischer B; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Peterli R; Kraljević M
Trials; 2024 Feb; 25(1):140. PubMed ID: 38389113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study.
Usta TA; Ozkaynak A; Kovalak E; Ergul E; Naki MM; Kaya E
Surg Endosc; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2305-13. PubMed ID: 25414065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is Surgeon Experience Relevant?
Currò G; La Malfa G; Lazzara S; Caizzone A; Fortugno A; Navarra G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):566-70. PubMed ID: 26076180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of crosstalk on three-dimensional laparoscopic performance and workload.
Sakata S; Grove PM; Watson MO; Stevenson ARL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4044-4050. PubMed ID: 28281125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2883-2887. PubMed ID: 33112544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.
Wilhelm D; Reiser S; Kohn N; Witte M; Leiner U; Mühlbach L; Ruschin D; Reiner W; Feussner H
Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2387-97. PubMed ID: 24651895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two-dimensional high-definition, ultra high-definition and three-dimensional endovision systems: an ex-vivo randomised study.
Bhattacharjee HK; Chaliyadan S; Mishra AK; Agarwal H; Suhani S; Joshi M; Parshad R
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5328-5337. PubMed ID: 32959182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the NASA-TLX Score in Ongoing Assessment of Mental Workload During a Laparoscopic Learning Curve in Bariatric Surgery.
Ruiz-Rabelo JF; Navarro-Rodriguez E; Di-Stasi LL; Diaz-Jimenez N; Cabrera-Bermon J; Diaz-Iglesias C; Gomez-Alvarez M; Briceño-Delgado J
Obes Surg; 2015 Dec; 25(12):2451-6. PubMed ID: 26459432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon.
Feng X; Morandi A; Boehne M; Imvised T; Ure BM; Kuebler JF; Lacher M
Surg Endosc; 2015 May; 29(5):1231-9. PubMed ID: 25673344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D Vision Provides Shorter Operative Time and More Accurate Intraoperative Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair Compared With 2D Vision.
Leon P; Rivellini R; Giudici F; Sciuto A; Pirozzi F; Corcione F
Surg Innov; 2017 Apr; 24(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 28118788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
