124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28987641)
1. Flocked nylon swabs versus RODAC plates for detection of multidrug-resistant organisms on environmental surfaces in intensive care units.
Okamoto K; Rhee Y; Schoeny M; Lolans K; Cheng J; Reddy S; Weinstein RA; Hayden MK; Popovich KJ;
J Hosp Infect; 2018 Jan; 98(1):105-108. PubMed ID: 28987641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of nylon-flocked swab and cellulose sponge methods for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and gram-negative organism recovery from high-touch surfaces in patient rooms.
Rock C; Anderson M; Lewis S; Scheeler V; Nowakowski E; Hsu YJ; Milstone AM; Carroll KC; Maragakis LL; Simner PJ;
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 39(10):1257-1261. PubMed ID: 30152307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs.
Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
J Hosp Infect; 2010 Aug; 75(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 20451296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Rodac imprint method to selective enrichment broth for recovery of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from environmental surfaces.
Hacek DM; Trick WE; Collins SM; Noskin GA; Peterson LR
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Dec; 38(12):4646-8. PubMed ID: 11101613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of protein coating of flocked swabs on the collection and release of clinically important bacteria.
Harry KH; Madhusudhan KT
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2014; 32(3):301-3. PubMed ID: 25008825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in the environment: moistened swabs versus Rodac plates.
Lemmen SW; Häfner H; Zolldann D; Amedick G; Lütticken R
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2001 Mar; 203(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 11279821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of separate vs pooled swab cultures, different media, broth enrichment and anatomical sites of screening for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical specimens.
Grmek-Kosnik I; Ihan A; Dermota U; Rems M; Kosnik M; Jorn Kolmos H
J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 16026896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Presence of biofilm containing viable multiresistant organisms despite terminal cleaning on clinical surfaces in an intensive care unit.
Vickery K; Deva A; Jacombs A; Allan J; Valente P; Gosbell IB
J Hosp Infect; 2012 Jan; 80(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 21899921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Active surveillance cultures: comparison of inguinal and rectal sites for detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria.
Stier CJ; Paganini MC; de Souza HH; Costa LM; dos Santos GS; Cruz ED
J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 26792684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring.
Goverde M; Willrodt J; Staerk A
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017 1/2; 71(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27516491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How well does transfer of bacterial pathogens by culture swabs correlate with transfer by hands?
Kanwar A; Mana TSC; Cadnum JL; Alhmidi H; Koganti S; Donskey CJ
Am J Infect Control; 2017 Aug; 45(8):923-925. PubMed ID: 28431852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. National validation study of a swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.
Hodges LR; Rose LJ; O'Connell H; Arduino MJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 May; 81(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 20193714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of microbial community composition, antimicrobial resistance and biofilm on intensive care surfaces.
Johani K; Abualsaud D; Costa DM; Hu H; Whiteley G; Deva A; Vickery K
J Infect Public Health; 2018; 11(3):418-424. PubMed ID: 29097104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of bacterial recovery and viability from three different swab transport systems.
Tan TY; Ng LS; Sim DM; Cheng Y; Min MO
Pathology; 2014 Apr; 46(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 24614721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting Clostridium difficile spores from inanimate surfaces of the hospital environment: which method is best?
Claro T; Daniels S; Humphreys H
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Sep; 52(9):3426-8. PubMed ID: 25009047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved recovery of Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces with cotton swabs over foam, nylon, or polyester, and the role of hydrophilicity of cotton in governing the recovery efficiency.
Thomas P; Mujawar MM; Upreti R; Sekhar AC
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2013 Jan; 79(1):381-4. PubMed ID: 23087040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of RODAC plates to measure containment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Class IIB biosafety cabinet during routine operations.
Daneau G; Nduwamahoro E; Fissette K; Rüdelsheim P; van Soolingen D; de Jong BC; Rigouts L
Int J Mycobacteriol; 2016 Jun; 5(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 27242225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of bacterial surface contamination in the hospital environment by application of a new product with persistent effect.
Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
J Hosp Infect; 2010 Jun; 75(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 20381907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative efficiency of nitrocellulose membranes versus RODAC plates in microbial sampling on surfaces.
Poletti L; Pasquarella C; Pitzurra M; Savino A
J Hosp Infect; 1999 Mar; 41(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 10204121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualification of high-recovery, flocked swabs as compared to traditional rayon swabs for microbiological environmental monitoring of surfaces.
Dalmaso G; Bini M; Paroni R; Ferrari M
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 18661868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
