These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28987839)

  • 21. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial.
    Delamarter RB; Fribourg DM; Kanim LE; Bae H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S167-75. PubMed ID: 14560188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Foot Drop 12 Years After Lumbar Total Disk Replacement.
    Telfeian AE; Oyelese A; Fridley J; Gokaslan ZL
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():136-139. PubMed ID: 29787873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chronic low back pain: Relevance of a new classification based on the injury pattern.
    Barrey CY; Le Huec JC;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Apr; 105(2):339-346. PubMed ID: 30792166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Results of Activ L Total Disk Replacement at 1- to 3-Year Follow-up.
    Lu S; Kong C; Hai Y; Kang N; Zang L; Wang Y; Yuan Y
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Nov; 28(9):E544-50. PubMed ID: 25532603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain.
    Fairbank J
    BMJ; 2011 May; 342():d2745. PubMed ID: 21596739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of sagittal spinal balance, levels of posterior instrumentation, and length of follow-up on low back pain in patients undergoing posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease: a multifactorial analysis.
    Korovessis P; Repantis T; Papazisis Z; Iliopoulos P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):898-905. PubMed ID: 20354466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The outcomes of arthroplasty in degenerative lesions in the lumbar spine.
    Glukhikh DL
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2015; 79(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 25909747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prosthetic total disk replacement--can we learn from total hip replacement?
    Mayer HM; Siepe CJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2011 Oct; 42(4):543-54, viii. PubMed ID: 21944590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease.
    Helgeson MD; Bevevino AJ; Hilibrand AS
    Spine J; 2013 Mar; 13(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 23420004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Complications and Rates of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Lumbar Fusion.
    Eliasberg CD; Kelly MP; Ajiboye RM; SooHoo NF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 26751061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lumbar disk replacement with the ProDisc prosthesis.
    Mirovsky Y; Shalmon E; Halpern Z; Halperin N; Blankstein A; Peer A
    Orthopedics; 2008 Feb; 31(2):133. PubMed ID: 19292209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fusion versus disk replacement for degenerative conditions of the lumbar and cervical spine: quid est testimonium?
    Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 20399356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
    Robaina-Padrón FJ
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.
    Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.
    Aghayev E; Etter C; Bärlocher C; Sgier F; Otten P; Heini P; Hausmann O; Maestretti G; Baur M; Porchet F; Markwalder TM; Schären S; Neukamp M; Röder C
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2114-26. PubMed ID: 24947182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Intervertebral (lumbar) disc replacement:the current state and future perspectives.
    Bodlák D; Jelen K; Lopot F
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2023 Oct; 44(7):444-452. PubMed ID: 37874551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Current Usage.
    Franco D; Largoza G; Montenegro TS; Gonzalez GA; Hines K; Harrop J
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2021 Oct; 32(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 34538477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.