These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28987851)

  • 41. Comparison of clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
    Li R; Shao X; Li X; Liu Y; Jiang W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(3):e23783. PubMed ID: 33545942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical outcomes and adverse events following transforaminal interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in elderly patients.
    Takahashi T; Hanakita J; Minami M; Kitahama Y; Kuraishi K; Watanabe M; Takeshima Y; Uesaka T
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2011; 51(12):829-35. PubMed ID: 22198104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Surgical Outcomes of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With and Without Kyphotic Alignment.
    Zhu C; Qiu X; Zhuang M; Cheng D; Liu Z
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():e396-e402. PubMed ID: 29913292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of postoperative sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters on the outcome of patients surgically treated for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Radovanovic I; Urquhart JC; Ganapathy V; Siddiqi F; Gurr KR; Bailey SI; Bailey CS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):448-453. PubMed ID: 28106523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
    Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Anteriorly Placed Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Instrumentation.
    Lee Y; Heard JC; McCurdy MA; Lambrechts MJ; Fras SI; Purtill W; Millar B; Kolowrat S; Issa TZ; D'Antonio ND; Rihn JA; Kurd MF; Kaye ID; Canseco JA; Vaccaro AR; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Schroeder GD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Aug; 49(15):1078-1084. PubMed ID: 37737684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pelvic parameters of sagittal balance in extreme lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disc disease.
    Johnson RD; Valore A; Villaminar A; Comisso M; Balsano M
    J Clin Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 20(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 23375396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Effects of different pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch after long posterior instrumentation and fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis].
    Sun XY; Hai Y; Zhang XN
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 55(6):435-440. PubMed ID: 28592076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Aoki Y; Nakajima A; Takahashi H; Sonobe M; Terajima F; Saito M; Takahashi K; Ohtori S; Watanabe A; Nakajima T; Takazawa M; Orita S; Eguchi Y; Nakagawa K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Aug; 16():213. PubMed ID: 26289077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sagittally Balanced Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Patients With Increased Sacral Slope and Greater Lumbar Lordosis Experience Less Back Pain After Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion Surgery.
    Liow MHL; Goh GS; Chua JL; Ling ZM; Soh RCC; Guo CM; Tan SB; Chen JL
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):E231-E235. PubMed ID: 31913174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization and fusion surgery in the treatment of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration: a retrospective analysis of single L5-S1 degenerative spondylosis covering 4 years.
    Han Y; Sun J; Luo C; Huang S; Li L; Ji X; Duan X; Wang Z; Pi G
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):706-712. PubMed ID: 27341057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Shen X; Wang L; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; He S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Feb; 29(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 24189485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Crandall DG; Revella J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):2126-33. PubMed ID: 19752698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Analysis of lumbosacral sagittal balance parameter variation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time 3D navigation techniques].
    Ma CR; Chen HX; Li GJ; He XY; Wang LS; Huang T; Meng ZB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Apr; 34(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 33896128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of three different posterior fixation techniques in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for two-level lumbar degenerative diseases: At a mean follow up time of 46 months.
    Liu F; Cao Y; Feng Z; Zhou X; Jiang C; Li X; Chen Z; Li Z; Liang Y; Jiang X; Dong J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Feb; 141():1-6. PubMed ID: 26691785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does vacuum phenomenon at non-fused discs affect the postoperative course after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients showing a positive value of difference in lumbar lordosis?
    Ohyama S; Aoki Y; Inoue M; Nakajima T; Sato Y; Sato M; Yoh S; Takahashi H; Nakajima A; Eguchi Y; Orita S; Inage K; Shiga Y; Nakagawa K; Ohtori S
    J Orthop Sci; 2024 Mar; 29(2):472-479. PubMed ID: 36697335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Radiological and clinical outcomes of midline lumbar fusion on sagittal lumbar-pelvic parameters for degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Wang YT; Li BX; Wang SJ; Li CD; Sun HL
    World J Clin Cases; 2022 Dec; 10(35):12880-12889. PubMed ID: 36569025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Relationship Between Alterations of Spinal/Pelvic Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Outcomes After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Xiao L; Zhao Q; Sun X; Liu C; Zhang Y; Xu H
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():e156-e164. PubMed ID: 31476474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.