These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28987908)

  • 1. Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study.
    Gutierrez-Sigut E; Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():261-279. PubMed ID: 28987908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish.
    Costello B; Caffarra S; Fariña N; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5202. PubMed ID: 33664324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers.
    Fariña N; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():27-33. PubMed ID: 28646750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation in Deaf and Hearing Readers.
    Holcomb PJ; Akers EM; Midgley KJ; Emmorey K
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):19. PubMed ID: 38312942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masked ERP repetition priming in deaf and hearing readers.
    Emmorey K; Holcomb PJ; Midgley KJ
    Brain Lang; 2021 Mar; 214():104903. PubMed ID: 33486233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to orthographic vs. phonological constraints on word recognition: An ERP study with deaf and hearing readers.
    Lee B; Martinez PM; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Dec; 177():108420. PubMed ID: 36396091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The N170 ERP component differs in laterality, distribution, and association with continuous reading measures for deaf and hearing readers.
    Emmorey K; Midgley KJ; Kohen CB; Sehyr ZS; Holcomb PJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():298-309. PubMed ID: 28986268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthographic and phonological processing in developing readers revealed by ERPs.
    Eddy MD; Grainger J; Holcomb PJ; Gabrieli JD
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1776-1783. PubMed ID: 27671210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping the reading circuitry for skilled deaf readers: an fMRI study of semantic and phonological processing.
    Emmorey K; Weisberg J; McCullough S; Petrich JA
    Brain Lang; 2013 Aug; 126(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 23747332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological-Lexical Feedback during Early Abstract Encoding: The Case of Deaf Readers.
    Perea M; Marcet A; Vergara-Martínez M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146265. PubMed ID: 26731110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing.
    Gutierrez-Sigut E; Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12321. PubMed ID: 31444497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study.
    Gutierrez-Sigut E; Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104938. PubMed ID: 34678681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical Competition Without Phonology: Masked Orthographic Neighbor Priming With Deaf Readers.
    Varga V; Tóth D; Csépe V
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2022 Mar; 27(2):151-165. PubMed ID: 34877600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selected Factors in Reading Comprehension for Deaf and Hearing Adults: Phonological Skills and Metacognition.
    Wang Y; Silvestri JA; Jahromi LB
    Am Ann Deaf; 2018; 162(5):445-462. PubMed ID: 29478998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading.
    Meng X; Jian J; Shu H; Tian X; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1219():91-102. PubMed ID: 18539265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers.
    Bélanger NN; Mayberry RI; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2237-52. PubMed ID: 23768045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthographic, Phonological, and Semantic Dynamics During Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Versus Hearing Adults.
    Peleg O; Ben-Hur G; Segal O
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2334-2344. PubMed ID: 32603647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ERP investigation of orthographic precision in deaf and hearing readers.
    Meade G; Grainger J; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107542. PubMed ID: 32590018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthographic and phonological selectivity across the reading system in deaf skilled readers.
    Glezer LS; Weisberg J; O'Grady Farnady C; McCullough S; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Emmorey K
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():500-512. PubMed ID: 30005927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological activation during visual word recognition in deaf and hearing children.
    Ormel E; Hermans D; Knoors H; Hendriks A; Verhoeven L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):801-20. PubMed ID: 20689045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.