227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28988121)
21. Study on the occurrence and neural bases of hemispatial neglect with different reference frames.
Yue Y; Song W; Huo S; Wang M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 93(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 22200396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The 3s Spreadsheet Test version 2 for assessing egocentric viewer-centered and allocentric stimulus-centered spatial neglect.
Chen P; Toglia J
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022; 29(6):1369-1379. PubMed ID: 33556259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment and functional impact of allocentric neglect: a reminder from a case study.
Shah PP; Spaldo N; Barrett AM; Chen P
Clin Neuropsychol; 2013; 27(5):840-63. PubMed ID: 23560431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Object-based neglect varies with egocentric position.
Karnath HO; Mandler A; Clavagnier S
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2983-93. PubMed ID: 21391769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Left egocentric neglect in early subacute right-stroke patients is related to damage of the superior longitudinal fasciculus.
Spanò B; Nardo D; Giulietti G; Matano A; Salsano I; Briani C; Vadalà R; Marzi C; De Luca M; Caltagirone C; Santangelo V
Brain Imaging Behav; 2022 Feb; 16(1):211-218. PubMed ID: 34328618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Right and left neglect are not anatomically homologous: A voxel-lesion symptom mapping study.
Moore MJ; Gillebert CR; Demeyere N
Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108024. PubMed ID: 34537205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The different association of allocentric and egocentric neglect with dorsal and ventral pathways: A case report.
Jang SH; Jang WH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(37):e12394. PubMed ID: 30213009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comprehensive voxel-wise, tract-based, and network lesion mapping reveals unique architectures of right and left visuospatial neglect.
Moore MJ; Hearne L; Demeyere N; Mattingley JB
Brain Struct Funct; 2023 Dec; 228(9):2067-2087. PubMed ID: 37697138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spatial and temporal dynamics of visual search tasks distinguish subtypes of unilateral spatial neglect: Comparison of two cases with viewer-centered and stimulus-centered neglect.
Mizuno K; Kato K; Tsuji T; Shindo K; Kobayashi Y; Liu M
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 26(4):610-34. PubMed ID: 26059555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time course of allocentric decay, egocentric decay, and allocentric-to-egocentric conversion in memory-guided reach.
Chen Y; Byrne P; Crawford JD
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 21056048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Subliminal galvanic-vestibular stimulation influences ego- and object-centred components of visual neglect.
Oppenländer K; Keller I; Karbach J; Schindler I; Kerkhoff G; Reinhart S
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():170-7. PubMed ID: 25445776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Neglecting the bottom space: an object-based disorder? A two-case observational study.
Martin J; Vuilleumier P; Assal F; Ronchi R
Neurocase; 2023 Aug; 29(4):121-131. PubMed ID: 38406985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Semiology of neglect: An update.
Rode G; Pagliari C; Huchon L; Rossetti Y; Pisella L
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Jun; 60(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 27103056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Internally-represented space and its mirror-reversed image of the visuospatial representation: A possible association.
Sumitani M; Misaki M; Kumagaya S; Yozu A; Otake Y; Osumi M; Miyauchi S
Med Hypotheses; 2015 Oct; 85(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 26279198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acute visual neglect and extinction: distinct functional state of the visuospatial attention system.
Umarova RM; Saur D; Kaller CP; Vry MS; Glauche V; Mader I; Hennig J; Weiller C
Brain; 2011 Nov; 134(Pt 11):3310-25. PubMed ID: 21948940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.
Byrne PA; Crawford JD
J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 103(6):3054-69. PubMed ID: 20457858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Visual feedback explains why propointing is better than antipointing in spatial neglect.
Utz KS; Hesse C; Hintz A; Grüneberger D; Kulke H; Roth I; Klos T; Kromichal V; Melms A; Schupp W; Kohl D; Schenk T
Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():114-127. PubMed ID: 28648411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transcranial direct current stimulation accelerates allocentric target detection.
Medina J; Beauvais J; Datta A; Bikson M; Coslett HB; Hamilton RH
Brain Stimul; 2013 May; 6(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 22784444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference.
Zaehle T; Jordan K; Wüstenberg T; Baudewig J; Dechent P; Mast FW
Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1137(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 17258693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Complexity vs. unity in unilateral spatial neglect.
Rode G; Fourtassi M; Pagliari C; Pisella L; Rossetti Y
Rev Neurol (Paris); 2017; 173(7-8):440-450. PubMed ID: 28843415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
