227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28988121)
41. Optokinetic stimulation affects both vertical and horizontal deficits of position sense in unilateral neglect.
Vallar G; Guariglia C; Magnotti L; Pizzamiglio L
Cortex; 1995 Dec; 31(4):669-83. PubMed ID: 8750025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cerebellar allocentric and action-intentional spatial neglect.
Milano NJ; Heilman KM
Cogn Behav Neurol; 2014 Sep; 27(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 25237748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Rotation or translation of auditory space in neglect? A case study of chronic right-sided neglect.
Kerkhoff G; Schindler I; Artinger F; Zoelch C; Bublak P; Finke K
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):923-30. PubMed ID: 16256151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Interaction between allocentric and egocentric reference frames in deaf and hearing populations.
Zhang M; Tan X; Shen L; Wang A; Geng S; Chen Q
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Feb; 54():68-76. PubMed ID: 24361477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Characterizing exploration behavior in spatial neglect: omissions and repetitive search.
Olk B; Harvey M
Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 16979143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Disentangling gravitational, environmental, and egocentric reference frames in spatial neglect.
Karnath HO; Fetter M; Niemeier M
J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Nov; 10(6):680-90. PubMed ID: 9831737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Allocentric spatial neglect with posterior cortical atrophy.
Zilli EM; Heilman KM
Neurocase; 2015; 21(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 24679168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Simulating and testing visual exploration in spatial neglect based on a new model for cortical coordinate transformation.
Niemeier M; Karnath HO
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Aug; 145(4):512-9. PubMed ID: 12172663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Exploring the time-course and the reference frames of adaptation to optical prisms and its aftereffects.
Terruzzi S; Crivelli D; Campana E; Pisoni A; Romero Lauro LJ; Bolognini N; Vallar G
Cortex; 2021 Aug; 141():16-35. PubMed ID: 34023799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Ghacibeh GA; Shenker JI; Winter KH; Triggs WJ; Heilman KM
Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Perception of active head rotation in patients with severe left unilateral spatial neglect.
Kaibe S; Okita M; Kaba H
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():41-45. PubMed ID: 28190682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Neural interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame in parietal-occipital junction.
Chen Q; Weidner R; Weiss PH; Marshall JC; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 24(11):2223-36. PubMed ID: 22721375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Frames of reference and categorical/coordinate spatial relations in a "what was where" task.
Ruotolo F; Iachini T; Ruggiero G; van der Ham IJ; Postma A
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2687-96. PubMed ID: 27180248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Just thinking about targets can aggravate neglect on cancellation tests.
Mennemeier MS; Morris M; Heilman KM
Neurocase; 2004 Feb; 10(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 15849157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Visual search for item- and array-centered locations in patients with left middle cerebral artery stroke.
Hildebrandt H; Schütze C; Ebke M; Brunner-Beeg F; Eling P
Neurocase; 2005 Dec; 11(6):416-26. PubMed ID: 16393755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. How many forms of perseveration? Evidence from cancellation tasks in right hemisphere patients.
Gandola M; Toraldo A; Invernizzi P; Corrado L; Sberna M; Santilli I; Bottini G; Paulesu E
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Dec; 51(14):2960-75. PubMed ID: 24200919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Neglect Patients Exhibit Egocentric or Allocentric Neglect for the Same Stimulus Contingent upon Task Demands.
Leyland LA; Godwin HJ; Benson V; Liversedge SP
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1941. PubMed ID: 28512354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Hypnosis meets neuropsychology: simulating visuospatial neglect in healthy participants.
Priftis K; Schiff S; Tikhonoff V; Giordano N; Amodio P; Umiltà C; Casiglia E
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3346-50. PubMed ID: 21903120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Common and specific neural correlates underlying the spatial congruency effect induced by the egocentric and allocentric reference frame.
Liu N; Li H; Su W; Chen Q
Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Apr; 38(4):2112-2127. PubMed ID: 28054740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Visuospatial neglect is more severe when stimulus density is large.
Nijboer TCW; Van Der Stigchel S
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 May; 41(4):399-410. PubMed ID: 30727817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
