These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28988271)

  • 1. Bridging the gap from prenatal karyotyping to whole-genome array comparative genomic hybridization in Hong Kong: survey on knowledge and acceptance of health-care providers and pregnant women.
    Cheng HYH; Kan AS; Hui PW; Lee CP; Tang MHY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 296(6):1109-1116. PubMed ID: 28988271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applications of array comparative genomic hybridization in obstetrics.
    Fruhman G; Van den Veyver IB
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2010 Mar; 37(1):71-85, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 20494259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
    Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whole-genome array CGH evaluation for replacing prenatal karyotyping in Hong Kong.
    Kan AS; Lau ET; Tang WF; Chan SS; Ding SC; Chan KY; Lee CP; Hui PW; Chung BH; Leung KY; Ma T; Leung WC; Tang MH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87988. PubMed ID: 24505343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jansen FA; Blumenfeld YJ; Fisher A; Cobben JM; Odibo AO; Borrell A; Haak MC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 25319878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases.
    Van den Veyver IB; Patel A; Shaw CA; Pursley AN; Kang SH; Simovich MJ; Ward PA; Darilek S; Johnson A; Neill SE; Bi W; White LD; Eng CM; Lupski JR; Cheung SW; Beaudet AL
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Jan; 29(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 19012303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in Japan.
    Yotsumoto J; Sekizawa A; Koide K; Purwosunu Y; Ichizuka K; Matsuoka R; Kawame H; Okai T
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Jul; 32(7):674-9. PubMed ID: 22553071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting.
    Maya I; Davidov B; Gershovitz L; Zalzstein Y; Taub E; Coppinger J; Shaffer LG; Shohat M
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Dec; 30(12-13):1131-7. PubMed ID: 20925131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) as standard approach for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. Clinical experience of 1763 prenatal cases.
    Papoulidis I; Sotiriadis A; Siomou E; Papageorgiou E; Eleftheriades M; Papadopoulos V; Oikonomidou E; Orru S; Manolakos E; Athanasiadis A
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Dec; 35(13):1269-77. PubMed ID: 26289927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-centered prenatal counseling: aligning obstetric healthcare professionals with needs of pregnant women.
    Farrell RM; Nutter B; Agatisa PK
    Women Health; 2015; 55(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 25794055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases.
    Scott F; Murphy K; Carey L; Greville W; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 23401365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal diagnosis and array comparative genomic hybridization characterization of trisomy 21 in a fetus associated with right congenital diaphragmatic hernia and a review of the literature of chromosomal abnormalities associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.
    Chen CP; Wang YL; Chern SR; Liu YP; Peng CR; Kuo YL; Wu PS; Chen WL; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 54(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25675923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism in over 1600 cases using array comparative genomic hybridization as a first line test.
    Carey L; Scott F; Murphy K; Mansfield N; Barahona P; Leigh D; Robertson R; McLennan A
    Prenat Diagn; 2014 May; 34(5):478-86. PubMed ID: 24453008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do antenatal care providers understand and do about oral health care during pregnancy: a cross-sectional survey in New South Wales, Australia.
    George A; Dahlen HG; Reath J; Ajwani S; Bhole S; Korda A; Chok HN; Miranda C; Villarosa A; Johnson M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Dec; 16(1):382. PubMed ID: 27903257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating Microarrays into Routine Prenatal Diagnosis: Determinants of Decision Making.
    Cordoba M; Andriole S; Evans SM; Britt D; Chu Lam M; Evans MI
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2016; 40(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 26744845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Karyotyping or rapid aneuploidy detection in prenatal diagnosis? The different views of users and providers of prenatal care.
    Boormans EM; Birnie E; Bilardo CM; Oepkes D; Bonsel GJ; van Lith JM
    BJOG; 2009 Sep; 116(10):1396-9. PubMed ID: 19566583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.
    Ngan OMY; Yi H; Wong SYS; Sahota D; Ahmed S
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):285. PubMed ID: 28870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hillman SC; Pretlove S; Coomarasamy A; McMullan DJ; Davison EV; Maher ER; Kilby MD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20658510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with congenital heart disease.
    Yan Y; Wu Q; Zhang L; Wang X; Dan S; Deng D; Sun L; Yao L; Ma Y; Wang L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 43(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24323407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
    Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.