BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28988647)

  • 1. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer.
    Basu P; Mittal S; Bhadra Vale D; Chami Kharaji Y
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb; 47():73-85. PubMed ID: 28988647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in the public health system in Nicaragua.
    Campos NG; Mvundura M; Jeronimo J; Holme F; Vodicka E; Kim JJ
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jun; 7(6):e015048. PubMed ID: 28619772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.
    Wright TC; Denny L; Kuhn L; Pollack A; Lorincz A
    JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 10632284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening capacity and cost-effectiveness of the human papillomavirus test versus cervicography as an adjunctive test to Pap cytology to detect high-grade cervical dysplasia.
    Song T; Seong SJ; Lee SK; Kim BR; Ju W; Kim KH; Nam K; Sim JC; Kim TJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():112-116. PubMed ID: 30682600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer.
    Naucler P; Ryd W; Törnberg S; Strand A; Wadell G; Elfgren K; Rådberg T; Strander B; Johansson B; Forslund O; Hansson BG; Rylander E; Dillner J
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(16):1589-97. PubMed ID: 17942872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Costs and benefits of different strategies to screen for cervical cancer in less-developed countries.
    Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Gaffikin L; Limpahayom KK; Lumbiganon P; Warakamin S; King J; Yi B; Ringers P; Blumenthal PD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(19):1469-83. PubMed ID: 12359856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.
    Mandelblatt JS; Lawrence WF; Womack SM; Jacobson D; Yi B; Hwang YT; Gold K; Barter J; Shah K
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2372-81. PubMed ID: 11988058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening.
    Naucler P; Ryd W; Törnberg S; Strand A; Wadell G; Elfgren K; Rådberg T; Strander B; Forslund O; Hansson BG; Hagmar B; Johansson B; Rylander E; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jan; 101(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 19141778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baseline cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and risk for cervical neoplasia: a 10-year cohort analysis.
    Sherman ME; Lorincz AT; Scott DR; Wacholder S; Castle PE; Glass AG; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Rush BB; Schiffman M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Jan; 95(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 12509400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Ogilvie GS; van Niekerk D; Krajden M; Smith LW; Cook D; Gondara L; Ceballos K; Quinlan D; Lee M; Martin RE; Gentile L; Peacock S; Stuart GCE; Franco EL; Coldman AJ
    JAMA; 2018 Jul; 320(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29971397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Three Approaches for Cervical Cancer Screening among HIV-Positive Women in Johannesburg, South Africa.
    Lince-Deroche N; Phiri J; Michelow P; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0141969. PubMed ID: 26569487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design and methods of the evaluation of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Mexico: The Morelos HPV Study.
    Flores Y; Shah K; Lazcano E; Hernández M; Bishai D; Ferris DG; Lörincz A; Hernández P; Salmerón J;
    Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 12216521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of visual inspection with acetic acid and cervical cytology to detect high-grade cervical neoplasia among HIV-infected women in India.
    Sahasrabuddhe VV; Bhosale RA; Kavatkar AN; Nagwanshi CA; Joshi SN; Jenkins CA; Shepherd BE; Kelkar RS; Sahay S; Risbud AR; Vermund SH; Mehendale SM
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jan; 130(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 21387289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
    Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.
    Tay SK; Lin LE; Goh RC
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2017 Jul; 46(7):267-273. PubMed ID: 28821890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening: results from women in a high-risk province of Costa Rica.
    Schiffman M; Herrero R; Hildesheim A; Sherman ME; Bratti M; Wacholder S; Alfaro M; Hutchinson M; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Lorincz AT
    JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10632285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Previous Papanicolaou and Hybrid Capture 2 human papillomavirus testing results of 5699 women with histologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.
    Wu T; Chen X; Zheng B; Li J; Xie F; Ding X; Zeng Z; Zhao C
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 31272603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.
    Fontham ETH; Wolf AMD; Church TR; Etzioni R; Flowers CR; Herzig A; Guerra CE; Oeffinger KC; Shih YT; Walter LC; Kim JJ; Andrews KS; DeSantis CE; Fedewa SA; Manassaram-Baptiste D; Saslow D; Wender RC; Smith RA
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2020 Sep; 70(5):321-346. PubMed ID: 32729638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
    JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
    Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.