These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28988790)

  • 1. Recent diagnostic procedures for colorectal cancer screening: Are they cost-effective?
    Arafa MA; Farhat KH
    Arab J Gastroenterol; 2017 Sep; 18(3):136-139. PubMed ID: 28988790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Economic Analysis.
    Palimaka S; Blackhouse G; Goeree R
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(15):1-43. PubMed ID: 26366240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Knudsen AB; Brenner H
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 20833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
    Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
    Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
    Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A
    Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
    Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.
    Patel SS; Kilgore ML
    Cancer Control; 2015 Apr; 22(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 26068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.
    Peterse EFP; Meester RGS; de Jonge L; Omidvari AH; Alarid-Escudero F; Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Feb; 113(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 32761199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
    Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical use of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in military training facilities and potential impact on HEDIS measures.
    Cash BD; Stamps K; McFarland EG; Spiegel AR; Wade SW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23290671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.
    Pyenson B; Pickhardt PJ; Sawhney TG; Berrios M
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2966-76. PubMed ID: 26350285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.
    Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH
    Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developments in Screening Tests and Strategies for Colorectal Cancer.
    Sovich JL; Sartor Z; Misra S
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():326728. PubMed ID: 26504799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography: accuracy, acceptance, safety and position in organised population screening.
    de Haan MC; Pickhardt PJ; Stoker J
    Gut; 2015 Feb; 64(2):342-50. PubMed ID: 25468258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening based on risk for colorectal cancer is the most cost-effective approach.
    Dan YY; Chuah BY; Koh DC; Yeoh KG
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Mar; 10(3):266-71.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22100624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Overview of current modalities of colorectal cancer screening].
    Kajzrlíková IM; Vítek P
    Vnitr Lek; 2016 Apr; 62(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 27250609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
    Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.